Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 455

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large-Scale Production of Size-Controlled MoS2 Nanosheets by Shear Exfoliation

Varrla, Eswaraiah, Backes, Claudia, Paton, Keith R., Harvey, Andrew, Gholamvand, Zahra, McCauley, Joe, Coleman, Jonathan N.·2015·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

In order to fulfill their potential for applications, it will be necessary to develop large-scale production methods for two-dimensional (2D) inorganic nanosheets. Here we demonstrate the large-scale shear-exfoliation of molybdenum disulfide nanosheets in aqueous surfactant solution using a kitchen blender. Using standard procedures, we measure how the MoS 2 concentration and production rate scale with processing parameters. However, we also use recently developed methods based on optical spectroscopy to simultaneously measure both nanosheet lateral size and thickness, allowing us to also study the dependence of nanosheet dimensions on processing parameters. We found the nanosheet concentration and production rates to depend sensitively on the mixing parameters (the MoS 2 concentration, C i; the mixing time, t; the liquid volume, V; and the rotor speed, N ). By optimizing mixing parameters, we achieved concentrations and production rates as high as 0.4 mg/mL and 1.3 mg/min, respectively. Conversely, the nanosheet size and thickness were largely invariant with these parameters. The nanosheet concentration is also extremely sensitive to the surfactant concentration. However, more interestingly the nanosheet lateral size and thickness also varied strongly with the surfactant concentration. This allows the mean nanosheet dimensions to be controlled during shear exfoliation at least in the range ∼40–220 nm for length and ∼2–12 layers for thickness. We demonstrate the importance of this by showing that the MoS 2 nanosheets prepared using different surfactant concentrations, and so displaying different nanosheets sizes, perform differently when used as hydrogen evolution catalysts. We find the nanosheets produced using high surfactant concentrations, which gives smaller flake sizes, perform significantly better, consistent with catalysis occurring at nanosheet edges. Finally, we also demonstrate that shear exfoliation using a kitchen blender is not limited to MoS 2 but can also be achieved for boron nitride and tungsten disulfide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm5044864

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 455

Metadata

Authors
Varrla, E., Backes, C., Paton, K. R., Harvey, A., Gholamvand, Z., McCauley, J., & Coleman, J. N.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2015-01-23
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
1129-1139
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2009204726
Cited by
455
References
5
FWCI
21.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-Scale Production of Size-Controlled MoS2 Nanosheets by Shear Exfoliation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm5044864
The paper
Varrla, E., Backes, C., Paton, K. R., Harvey, A., Gholamvand, Z., McCauley, J., & Coleman, J. N. (2015). Large-Scale Production of Size-Controlled MoS2 Nanosheets by Shear Exfoliation. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm5044864

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.