The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nontoxic Carbon Dots Potently Inhibit Human Insulin Fibrillation
Abstract
One prevention and therapeutic strategy for diseases associated with peptide or protein fibrillation is to inhibit or delay the fibrillation process. Carbon dots (C–Dots) have recently emerged as benign nanoparticles to replace toxic quantum dots and have attracted great attention because of their unique optical properties and potential applications in biological systems. However, the effect of C-Dots on peptide or protein fibrillation has not been explored. In this in vitro study, human insulin was selected as a model to investigate the effect of C-Dots on insulin fibrillation. Water-soluble fluorescent C-Dots with sizes less than 6 nm were prepared from carbon powder and characterized by UV–vis spectroscopy, fluorescence, Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry, X-ray photoelectron spectrometry, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy. These C-Dots were able to efficiently inhibit insulin fibrillation in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibiting effect of C-Dots was even observed at 0.2 μg/mL. Importantly, 40 μg/mL of C-Dots prevent 0.2 mg/mL of human insulin from fibrillation for 5 days under 65 °C, whereas insulin denatures in 3 h under the same conditions without C-Dots. The inhibiting effect is likely due to the interaction between C-Dots and insulin species before elongation. Cytotoxicity study shows that these C-Dots have very low cytotoxicity. Therefore, these C-Dots have the potential to inhibit insulin fibrillation in biological systems and in the pharmaceutical industry for the processing and formulation of insulin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crossing the blood-brain barrier with nanoparticles
Zhou, Y., Peng, Z., Seven, E. S., & Leblanc, R. M. (2018) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.12.015 · Cited by 837
Self-citationIravani, S., & Varma, R. S. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-00984-0 · Cited by 532
Mintz, K. J., Zhou, Y., & Leblanc, R. M. (2019) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c8nr10059d · Cited by 462
Self-citationRecent Advances in Synthesis, Optical Properties, and Biomedical Applications of Carbon Dots
Anwar, S., Ding, H., Xu, M., Hu, X., Li, Z., Wang, J., Liu, L., Jiang, L., Wang, D., Dong, C., et al. (2019) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.9b00112 · Cited by 367
Recent advances in carbon dots for bioimaging applications
Li, H., Yan, X., Kong, D., Jin, R., Sun, C., Du, D., Lin, Y., & Lu, G. (2020) · Nanoscale Horizons · doi:10.1039/c9nh00476a · Cited by 304
Triple conjugated carbon dots as a nano-drug delivery model for glioblastoma brain tumors
Hettiarachchi, S. D., Graham, R. M., Mintz, K. J., Zhou, Y., Vanni, S., Peng, Z., & Leblanc, R. M. (2019) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c8nr08970a · Cited by 294
Self-citationCarbon-based quantum particles: an electroanalytical and biomedical perspective
Nekoueian, K., Amiri, M., Sillanpää, M., Marken, F., Boukherroub, R., & Szunerits, S. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00445e · Cited by 294
Park, S. J. (2020) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s254808 · Cited by 293
Cui, L., Ren, X., Wang, J., & Sun, M. (2020) · Materials Today Nano · doi:10.1016/j.mtnano.2020.100091 · Cited by 236
Cancer Targeting and Drug Delivery Using Carbon-Based Quantum Dots and Nanotubes
Pardo, J., Peng, Z., & Leblanc, R. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23020378 · Cited by 226
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, S., Wang, L., Chusuei, C. C., Suarez, V. M., Blackwelder, P. L., Micic, M., Orbulescu, J., & Leblanc, R. M.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1764-1771
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W1977956532
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.