Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hard Templates for Soft Materials: Creating Nanostructured Organic Materials

Thomas, Arne, Goettmann, Frederic, Antonietti, Markus·2008·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

This review describes the possibilities of using hard templates to create nanostructured “soft” materials, for example, polymer networks, carbon nitrides, or carbonaceous materials, that is, materials which are still organic in their nature. Examples are given for the whole range of hard templates described in the literature, starting from silica nanoparticles, zeolites, and periodic mesoporous silicas to aluminum oxide membranes and colloidal crystals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm702126j

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, A., Goettmann, F., & Antonietti, M.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2008-01-08
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
738-755
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2078227552
Cited by
389
References
3
FWCI
16.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hard Templates for Soft Materials: Creating Nanostructured Organic Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm702126j
The paper
Thomas, A., Goettmann, F., & Antonietti, M. (2008). Hard Templates for Soft Materials: Creating Nanostructured Organic Materials. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm702126j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.