The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Highly Efficient Adsorption of Bulky Dye Molecules in Wastewater on Ordered Mesoporous Carbons
Abstract
We demonstrate, for the first time, the application of ordered mesoporous carbons with large pore sizes prepared from the surfactant-templating approach in efficient disposal of wastewater containing bulky dye molecules. The adsorption amount for the bulky dye (methylthionine chloride, fuchsin basic, rhodamine B, brilliant yellow, methyl orange, or Sudan G) is almost twice that of the activated carbon in which mesopores contribute almost 100% to the total surface area and volume. The ordered mesoporous carbon adsorbent has a high adsorption rate (>99.9%) for low-concentration dyes, good performance in decoloration regardless of the dye nature, including basic, acidic, or azo dyes, and high stability after dye elution. To establish the relationship between the pore texture and adsorption properties, three kinds of ordered mesoporous carbons with different pore sizes, surface areas, and pore volumes have been synthesized by using phenolic resins as carbon sources and triblock copolymer as a structure-directing agent. The XRD, TEM, and N 2 sorption measurements reveal that all mesoporous carbonaceous materials have the highly ordered 2D hexagonal mesostructure, high surface areas (398−2580 m 2 /g), large pore volumes (0.51−2.16 cm 3 /g), and uniform pore sizes ranging from 4.5 to 6.4 nm. The adsorption capacities are compared and the pore occupation is estimated to understand the adsorption behaviors in the ordered mesopores with different diameters and models. The spatial effect of dye molecules is the determinative factor for the adsorption in ordered mesoporous carbons with various pore textural properties. The mesoporous carbon with an extremely high surface area (2580 m 2 /g), a large pore volume (2.16 cm 3 /g), and bimodal pores (6.4 and 1.7 nm) prepared from the silica−carbon composite shows the highest adsorption capacities for bulky basic dyes among the three ordered mesoporous carbons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: A review
Zhang, X., Gao, B., Creamer, A. E., Cao, C., & Li, Y. (2017) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013 · Cited by 1,479
Yuan, B., Wu, X., Chen, Y., Huang, J., Luo, H., & Deng, S. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4000643 · Cited by 305
Zhang, S., Zeng, M., Li, J., Li, J., Xu, J., & Wang, X. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c3ta14604a · Cited by 285
Li, H., Cao, X., Zhang, C., Yu, Q., Zhao, Z., Niu, X., Sun, X., Liu, Y., Ma, L., & Li, Z. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra01647f · Cited by 282
Gong, J., Liu, J., Chen, X., Jiang, Z., Wen, X., Mijowska, E., & Tang, T. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c4ta05118a · Cited by 198
Basnet, P., & Zhao, Y. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c3ta14000h · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuang, X., Wan, Y., Feng, C., Shen, Y., & Zhao, D.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-01-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 706-716
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2058299697
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.