The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticle, Size, Shape, and Interfacial Effects on Leakage Current Density, Permittivity, and Breakdown Strength of Metal Oxide−Polyolefin Nanocomposites: Experiment and Theory
Abstract
A series of 0−3 metal oxide−polyolefin nanocomposites are synthesized via in situ olefin polymerization, using the following single-site metallocene catalysts: C 2 -symmetric dichloro[ rac -ethylenebisindenyl]zirconium(IV), Me 2 Si( t BuN)(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 )TiCl 2, and (η 5 -C 5 Me 5 )TiCl 3 immobilized on methylaluminoxane (MAO)-treated BaTiO 3, ZrO 2, 3-mol %-yttria-stabilized zirconia, 8-mol %-yttria-stabilized zirconia, sphere-shaped TiO 2 nanoparticles, and rod-shaped TiO 2 nanoparticles. The resulting composite materials are structurally characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). TEM analysis shows that the nanoparticles are well-dispersed in the polymer matrix, with each individual nanoparticle surrounded by polymer. Electrical measurements reveal that most of these nanocomposites have leakage current densities of ∼10 −6 −10 −8 A/cm 2; relative permittivities increase as the nanoparticle volume fraction increases, with measured values as high as 6.1. At the same volume fraction, rod-shaped TiO 2 nanoparticle−isotactic polypropylene nanocomposites exhibit significantly greater permittivities than the corresponding sphere-shaped TiO 2 nanoparticle−isotactic polypropylene nanocomposites. Effective medium theories fail to give a quantitative description of the capacitance behavior, but do aid substantially in interpreting the trends qualitatively. The energy storage densities of these nanocomposites are estimated to be as high as 9.4 J/cm 3 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electromagnetic Mixing Formulas and Applications
Sihvola, A. (1999) · doi:10.1049/pbew047e · Cited by 1,838
Cited by
Flexible Nanodielectric Materials with High Permittivity for Power Energy Storage
Dang, Z., Yuan, J., Yao, S., & Liao, R. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201301752 · Cited by 1,454
Li, Y., Huang, X., Hu, Z., Jiang, P., Li, S., & Tanaka, T. (2011) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am2010459 · Cited by 386
Defects and Aliovalent Doping Engineering in Electroceramics
Feng, Y., Wu, J., Chi, Q., Li, W., Yu, Y., & Fei, W. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00507 · Cited by 353
Zhang, X., Jiang, J., Shen, Z., Dan, Z., Li, M., Lin, Y., Nan, C., Chen, L., & Shen, Y. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201707269 · Cited by 322
Pan, Z., Yao, L., Zhai, J., Fu, D., Shen, B., & Wang, H. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b13663 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, N., DiBenedetto, S. A., Tewari, P., Lanagan, M. T., Ratner, M. A., & Marks, T. J.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-01-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1567-1578
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2086550370
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.