The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure and Magnetism in λ-MnO2. Geometric Frustration in a Defect Spinel
Abstract
λ-MnO 2, a metastable form of manganese dioxide, retains the cubic spinel structure upon lithium removal from LiMn 2 O 4 by soft chemical methods, either electrochemical or acid leaching. The minimum lithium content, achieved by the latter route at pH 1, is Li 0.10 MnO 2, which is in reasonable agreement with previous reports. For lithium contents near the minimum value, long-range antiferromagnetic order sets in below T N = 32 K, and Curie−Weiss susceptibility behavior is found above 125 K, with fitting constants, θ c = −104(4) K and C = 1.97(2) emu-K/mol. This value of C is consistent with the lithium content found analytically. The susceptibility is remarkably field dependent in the temperature range near T N for some samples with larger lithium contents, which might be understood in terms of field-induced short-range ferromagnetic correlations. Neutron diffraction studies show a complex magnetic order described by a propagation vector k = ( 1 / 2 1 / 2 1 / 2 )(128 Mn moments per magnetic unit cell) and confirm the T N = 32 K. A model for the magnetic structure is proposed that is consistent with the neutron intensities. The complexity of the magnetic structure is consistent with the geometric frustration inherent in the Mn sublattice, which is comprised of a three-dimensional array of corner-sharing tetrahedra. The properties of λ-MnO 2 are compared and contrasted with those of β-MnO 2, with the rutile structure, and the pyrochlore Y 2 Mn 2 O 7, with the same topology for the Mn(4+) sublattice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geometrically frustrated magnetic materials
Greedan, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b003682j · Cited by 904
Self-citationExtraction of lithium with functionalized lithium ion-sieves
Xu, X., Chen, Y., Wan, P., Gasem, K., Wang, K., He, T., Adidharma, H., & Fan, M. (2016) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.09.004 · Cited by 536
Lee, B., Seo, H. R., Lee, H. R., Yoon, C. S., Kim, J. H., Chung, K. Y., Cho, B. W., & Oh, S. H. (2016) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201600702 · Cited by 489
Energetics ofMnO2polymorphs in density functional theory
Kitchaev, D. A., Peng, H., Liu, Y., Sun, J., Perdew, J. P., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.045132 · Cited by 258
Introduction of manganese-based lithium-ion Sieve-A review
Weng, D., Duan, H., Hou, Y., Huo, J., Chen, L., Zhang, F., & Wang, J. (2020) · Progress in Natural Science: Materials International · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2020.01.017 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Greedan, J. E., Raju, N. P., Wills, A. S., Morin, C., Shaw, S. M., & Reimers, J. N.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-09-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3058-3067
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2092749358
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Magnetism in λ-MnO2. Geometric Frustration in a Defect Spinel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cm9801789
- The paper
- Greedan, J. E., Raju, N. P., Wills, A. S., Morin, C., Shaw, S. M., & Reimers, J. N. (1998). Structure and Magnetism in λ-MnO2. Geometric Frustration in a Defect Spinel. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9801789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.