The DOI matches its Crossref record.
QSAR studies on hallucinogens
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTQSAR studies on hallucinogensSatya P. Gupta, Prithvi Singh, and Mahesh C. BindalCite this: Chem. Rev. 1983, 83, 6, 633–649Publication Date (Print):December 1, 1983Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 December 1983https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr00058a003https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00058a003research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views454Altmetric-Citations43LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“while decreasing hallucinogenic potency predicted from a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study [67].”
From Molecular and Functional Imaging Studies of Psychedelic Drug Action in Animals and Humans. (2021) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular and Functional Imaging Studies of Psychedelic Drug Action in Animals and Humans.
Cumming, P., Scheidegger, M., Dornbierer, D., Palner, M., Quednow, B. B., & Martin-Soelch, C. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26092451 · Cited by 43
Applications and potential of in silico approaches for psychedelic chemistry
Karabulut, S., Kaur, H., & Gauld, J. W. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28165966 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, S. P., Singh, P., & Bindal, M. C.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1983-12-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 633-649
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2047907996
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Keywords
- hallucinogens, QSAR, structure-activity relationship, psychedelic compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review