The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fragmentation Methods: A Route to Accurate Calculations on Large Systems
Abstract
Theoretical chemists have always strived to perform quantum mechanics (QM) calculations on larger and larger molecules and molecular systems, as well as condensed phase species, that are frequently much larger than the current state-of-the-art would suggest is possible. The desire to study species (with acceptable accuracy) that are larger than appears to be feasible has naturally led to the development of novel methods, including semiempirical approaches, reduced scaling methods, and fragmentation methods. The focus of the present review is on fragmentation methods, in which a large molecule or molecular system is made more computationally tractable by explicitly considering only one part (fragment) of the whole in any particular calculation. If one can divide a species of interest into fragments, employ some level of ab initio QM to calculate the wave function, energy, and properties of each fragment, and then combine the results from the fragment calculations to predict the same properties for the whole, the possibility exists that the accuracy of the outcome can approach that which would be obtained from a full (nonfragmented) calculation. It is this goal that drives the development of fragmentation methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Cited by
The many-body expansion combined with neural networks
Yao, K., Herr, J. E., & Parkhill, J. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4973380 · Cited by 120
The Shape of Full Configuration Interaction to Come
Eriksen, J. J. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03225 · Cited by 66
Fujii, K., Mizuta, K., Ueda, H., Mitarai, K., Mizukami, W., & Nakagawa, Y. O. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10917 · Cited by 66
Application of Quantum Computing to Biochemical Systems: A Look to the Future
Cheng, H.-P., Deumens, E., Freericks, J. K., Li, C., & Sanders, B. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.587143 · Cited by 53
From QM/MM to ML/MM: A new era in multiscale modeling
Grassano, J. S., Pickering, I., Roitberg, A. E., Estrin, D. A., & Semelak, J. A. (2025) · Chemical Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0260078 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, M. S., Fedorov, D. G., Pruitt, S. R., & Slipchenko, L. V.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-26
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 632-672
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2033777798
- Cited by
- 1,106
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fragmentation Methods: A Route to Accurate Calculations on Large Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cr200093j
- The paper
- Gordon, M. S., Fedorov, D. G., Pruitt, S. R., & Slipchenko, L. V. (2012). Fragmentation Methods: A Route to Accurate Calculations on Large Systems. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200093j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.