The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Porous Iron Trimesates Basolite F300 and MIL-100(Fe) As Heterogeneous Catalysts for Lewis Acid and Oxidation Reactions: Roles of Structural Defects and Stability
Open accessAbstract
Two porous iron trimesates, namely, commercial Basolite F300 (Fe(BTC); BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate) with unknown structure and synthetic MIL-100(Fe) (MIL stands for Material of Institut Lavoisier) of well-defined crystalline structure, have been compared as heterogeneous catalysts for four different reactions. It was found that while for catalytic processes requiring strong Lewis acid sites, Fe(BTC) performs better, MIL-100(Fe) is the preferred catalyst for oxidation reactions. These catalytic results have been rationalized by a combined in situ infrared and 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopic characterization. It is proposed that the presence of extra Brønsted acid sites on the Fe(BTC) and the easier redox behavior of the MIL-100(Fe) could explain these comparative catalytic performances. The results illustrate the importance of structural defects (presence of weak Brønsted acid sites) and structural stability (MIL-100(Fe) is stable upon annealing at 280 °C despite Fe 3+ -to-Fe 2+ reduction) on the catalytic activity of these two solids, depending on the reaction type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
Catalysis and photocatalysis by metal organic frameworks
Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Li, Z., & Garcia, H. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00256h · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationMetal–organic and covalent organic frameworks as single-site catalysts
Rogge, S. M. J., Bavykina, A., Hajek, J., Garcia, H., Olivos-Suarez, A. I., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Vimont, A., Clet, G., Bazin, P., Kapteijn, F., et al. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00033b · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationCO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Catalysis by Metal Organic Frameworks: Perspective and Suggestions for Future Research
Yang, D., & Gates, B. C. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b04515 · Cited by 932
Iron(III)-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks As Visible Light Photocatalysts
Laurier, K. G. M., Vermoortele, F., Ameloot, R., De Vos, D. E., Hofkens, J., & Roeffaers, M. B. J. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja405086e · Cited by 600
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhakshinamoorthy, A., Alvaro, M., Horcajada, P., Gibson, E., Vishnuvarthan, M., Vimont, A., Grenèche, J.-M., Serre, C., Daturi, M., & Garcia, H.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-08-30
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2060-2065
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010725297
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
