Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Chemically Bonded TiO2/Graphene Composites Based on the Effective Interfacial Charge Transfer through the C–Ti Bond

Huang, Qingwu, Tian, Shouqin, Zeng, Dawen, Wang, Xiaoxia, Song, Wulin, Li, Yingying, Xiao, Wei, Xie, Changsheng·2013·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Recently, graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts have attracted more attention because of their enhanced photocatalytic activity caused by interfacial charge transfer (IFCT). However, the effect of a chemical bond is rarely involved for the IFCT. In this work, TiO 2 /graphene composites with a chemically bonded interface were prepared by a facile solvothermal method using tetrabutyl orthotitanate (TBOT) as the Ti source. The chemically bonded TiO 2 /graphene composites effectively enhanced their photocatalytic activity in photodegradation of formaldehyde in air, and the graphene content exhibited an obvious influence on the photocatalytic activity. The prepared composite with 2.5 wt % graphene (G2.5-TiO 2 ) showed the highest photocatalytic activity, exceeding that of Degussa P25, as-prepared pure TiO 2 nanoparticles, and the mechanically mixed TiO 2 /graphene (2.5 wt %) composite by a factor of 1.5, 2.6, and 2.3, respectively. The enhancement in the photocatalytic activity was attributed to the synergetic effect between graphene and TiO 2 nanoparticles. Other than the graphene as an excellent electron acceptor and transporter, the enhanced photocatalytic activity was caused by IFCT through a C–Ti bond, which markedly decreased the recombination of electron–hole pairs and increased the number of holes participating in the photooxidation process, confirmed by XPS analysis, the gaseous phase transient photocurrent response, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and photoluminescence spectra. This work about effective IFCT through a chemically bonded interface can provide new insights for directing the design of new heterogeneous photocatalysts, which can be applied in environmental protection, water splitting, and photoelectrochemical conversion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs400080w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Huang, Q., Tian, S., Zeng, D., Wang, X., Song, W., Li, Y., Xiao, W., & Xie, C.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2013-06-06
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
1477-1485
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323531722
Cited by
516
References
1
FWCI
17.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.