The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catalytic CO2 Hydrogenation to Formate by a Ruthenium Pincer Complex
Abstract
This paper reports the hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formate catalyzed by the Ru pincer complex Ru(PNN)CO(H) (PNN = 6-(di- tert -butylphosphinomethylene)-2-( N, N -diethylaminomethyl)-1,6-dihydropyridine). Stoichiometric studies are presented that support the feasibility of the individual steps in a proposed catalytic cycle for this transformation. The influence of base and solvent on catalyst performance is explored. Overall, under optimized conditions (using diglyme as the solvent and potassium carbonate as the base) up to 23,000 turnovers of formate and a turnover frequency of up to 2,200 h –1 can be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15008a · Cited by 3,316
Metadata
- Authors
- Huff, C. A., & Sanford, M. S.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-25
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2412-2416
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051586079
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
