Cited by 321Catalysts for Methane ReformingThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes

Nickel-iron alloy supported over iron-alumina catalysts for steam reforming of biomass tar model compound

Ashok, J., Kawi, S.·2014·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Iron–alumina-supported nickel–iron alloy catalysts were tested in a fixed-bed reactor for steam reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound. The influence of the calcination temperature of the iron–alumina support was also explored for the steam reforming reaction. Ni supported on an Fe 2 O 3 –Al 2 O 3 support calcined at 500 °C [NFA(500)] gave superior catalytic performance in terms of activity and stability over other catalysts. NFA(500) gave a toluene conversion of more than 90% for a period of 26 h with a H 2 /CO value of 4.5. According to XRD analysis, the Ni–Fe alloys were formed and stable throughout the reforming reaction. It was observed from XPS results that the surface of the reduced NFA(500) catalyst was enriched with Fe species, where the other catalysts were enriched with Ni species. These surface Fe species play the role of cocatalysts by increasing the coverage of oxygen species during the reforming reaction to enhance the reaction of toluene and suppresses coke formation. The presence of oxygen species in the reduced catalysts was confirmed by temperature-programmed surface reaction (TPSR) with toluene and water over NFA catalysts. A temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) study on spent catalysts revealed that the NFA(500) and NFA(700) catalysts have an additional low-temperature oxidation peak at around 525 and 535 °C, respectively, suggesting the presence of a higher amount of amorphous carbon compared with the NFA(900) catalyst. The presence of a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs400621p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashok, J., & Kawi, S.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Kawi, S.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2013-12-18
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
289-301
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316134587
Cited by
321
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Keywords
biomass tar, toluene steam reforming, calcination temperature, cocatalyst, surface oxygen species, coke suppression, catalyst stability, amorphous carbon, fixed-bed reactor, H2/CO ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review