Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Class of (Pd–Ni–P) Electrocatalysts for the Ethanol Oxidation Reaction in Alkaline Media

Jiang, Rongzhong, Tran, Dat T., McClure, Joshua P., Chu, Deryn·2014·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

A class of Pd–Ni–P electrocatalysts are prepared for the ethanol electrooxidation reaction (EOR). X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscope reveal that the synthesized Pd–Ni–P catalyst possesses a more amorphous structure with smaller particle sizes when compared with a Pd–Ni sample without P and a control Pd black (Pd-blk) sample. The Pd–Ni–P catalyst contains double the number of electrocatalytically active sites (12.03%) compared with the Pd–Ni (6.04%) and Pd-blk (5.12%) samples. For the EOR, the Pd–Ni–P catalyst has the lowest onset potential (−0.88 V vs SCE), the most negative peak potential (−0.27 V vs SCE), and the highest EOR activity in 0.1 M KOH solution. Moreover, a 110 mV decrease in overpotential is observed for the EOR on the Pd–Ni–P catalyst compared with the Pd-blk catalyst. A Tafel slope of 60 mV/dec at low polarization potentials (<−0.76 V vs SCE) was obtained for EOR at a Pd–Ni–P-coated electrode with a reaction rate constant of 2.8 × 10 –4 cm·S –1 ·M –1 at −0.3 V vs SCE in KOH media. Finally, we find that the electrooxidation of ethanol on the Pd–Ni–P catalyst undergoes a 4-electron process to acetate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs500462z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, R., Tran, D. T., McClure, J. P., & Chu, D.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2014-07-03
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
2577-2586
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013529394
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.