The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective Hydrogenation of Biomass-Based 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural over Catalyst of Palladium Immobilized on Amine-Functionalized Metal–Organic Frameworks
Abstract
A catalyst of palladium [Pd/MIL-101(Al)-NH 2 ] supported on amine-functionalized Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) allows selective hydrogenation of biomass-based 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) to 2,5-dihydroxymethyl-tetrahydrofuran (DHMTHF) with 2,5-dihydroxymethylfuran (DHMF) as an observed “intermediate”. The Pd/MIL-101(Al)-NH 2 was prepared by using a direct anionic exchange approach and subsequent gentle reduction. The presence of free amine moieties in the frameworks of MIL-101(Al)-NH 2 is suggested to play a key role on the formation of uniform and well-dispersed palladium nanoparticles on the support. The adsorption experiments reveal that the amine-functionalized MOF supports show preferential adsorption to hydrogenation intermediate DHMF than in the case of reactant HMF owing to an enhanced hydrophilic nature of DHMF as well as improved hydrogen bonding interactions between DHMF and the MOF support, which promotes a further hydrogenation of DHMF to DHMTHF upon the in situ formation of DHMF over Pd/MIL-101(Al)-NH 2 . Moreover, our results also indicate that the observed high selectivity toward DHMTHF form HMF is closely related to the cooperation between the metallic site and the free amine moiety on the MOF support. Under the optimal conditions, a maximum DHMTHF yield of 96% with a full conversion of HMF is obtained by using Pd/MIL-101(Al)-NH 2 (Pd 3.0 wt %) catalyst at a low reaction temperature of 30 °C in aqueous medium. The research thus highlights new perspectives for aluminum-based and amine-functionalized MOF material for biomass transformation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Hydroxymethylfurfural, A Versatile Platform Chemical Made from Renewable Resources
van Putten, R.-J., van der Waal, J. C., de Jong, E., Rasrendra, C. B., Heeres, H. J., & de Vries, J. G. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300182k · Cited by 2,886
An Amine-Functionalized MIL-53 Metal−Organic Framework with Large Separation Power for CO 2 and CH 4
Couck, S., Denayer, J. F. M., Baron, G. V., Rémy, T., Gascon, J., & Kapteijn, F. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja900555r · Cited by 988
Cited by
Metal–organic frameworks meet metal nanoparticles: synergistic effect for enhanced catalysis
Yang, Q., Xu, Q., & Jiang, H.-L. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00724d · Cited by 1,892
Hu, L., Lin, L., Wu, Z., Zhou, S., & Liu, S. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.042 · Cited by 445
Efficient valorization of biomass to biofuels with bifunctional solid catalytic materials
Li, H., Fang, Z., Smith, R. L., & Yang, S. (2016) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2016.04.004 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., Liu, R., Guo, Y., Chen, L., & Gao, H.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-12-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 722-733
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323316366
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.