The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unraveling the Catalytic Mechanism of Co3O4 for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction in a Li–O2 Battery
Abstract
Unraveling the catalytic mechanism of transition-metal oxides (TMOs) for the charging reaction in a Li–O 2 battery and characterizing their surface structures and electronic structure properties of active sites are of great importance for the development of an effective catalyst to improve low round-trip efficiency and power density. In the current study, an interfacial model is first constructed to study the decomposition reaction mechanism of Li 2 O 2 supported on Co 3 O 4 surfaces. The computational results indicate that the O-rich Co 3 O 4 (111)C with a relatively low surface energy in high O 2 concentration has a high catalytic activity in reducing overpotential and O 2 desorption barrier due to the electron transfer from the Li 2 O 2 layer to the underlying surface. Meanwhile, the basic sites of Co 3 O 4 (110)B surface induce Li 2 O 2 decomposition into Li 2 O and a dangling Co–O bond, which further leads to a high charging voltage in the subsequent cycles. The calculations for transition-metal (TM)-doped Co 3 O 4 (111) indicate that P-type doping of Co 3 O 4 (111) exhibits significant catalysis in decreasing both charging overpotential and O 2 desorption barrier. The ionization potential of doped TM is determined as an important parameter to regulate the catalytic activity of metal oxides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Xu, L., Jiang, Q., Xiao, Z., Li, X., Huo, J., Wang, S., & Dai, L. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201600687 · Cited by 2,073
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Ren, X., Liu, J., Zhang, W., & Wen, Z.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-11-25
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-81
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329725819
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.