The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies: Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant
Abstract
Calculations of the binding free energy of various nonpolar aromatic ligands with the L99A mutant of T4 lysozyme using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation are presented. To ensure better convergence, biasing potentials are used to restrain the ligand orientation and center-of-mass movement relative to the binding site when the ligand is decoupled from its environment in the binding pocket. The bias introduced by the restraint potentials is removed once the ligand fully interacts with the rest of the system and the calculated binding free energy is independent of the applied restraints. To decrease the computational cost, the simulations are generated with a reduced system in which protein and water atoms within a 15 Å-radius sphere around the ligand are included explicitly, while the rest of the system is treated with the generalized solvent boundary potential (GSBP). For all the ligands, the precision of the calculated free energy is less than 0.5 kcal/mol. For small nonpolar ligands such as benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene, the calculated binding free energies are within 1.1 kcal/mol of the experimental values. For larger ligands, the computed binding free energies are slightly more favorable than the experimental values. The nonbinding polar molecule, phenol, has a calculated binding free energy of -0.88 kcal/mol. The simulation protocol presented here provides a way to calculate the binding free energy of small molecules to receptors at moderate computational cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calculation of absolute protein–ligand binding free energy from computer simulations
Woo, H.-J., & Roux, B. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409005102 · Cited by 661
Self-citationMobley, D. L., Chodera, J. D., & Dill, K. A. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2221683 · Cited by 316
A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.
Wei, B. Q., Baase, W. A., Weaver, L. H., Matthews, B. W., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Standard Binding Free Energies from Computer Simulations: What Is the Best Strategy?
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct3008099 · Cited by 343
Self-citationPredicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site
Mobley, D. L., Graves, A. P., Chodera, J. D., McReynolds, A. C., Shoichet, B. K., & Dill, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · Cited by 310
Rocklin, G. J., Mobley, D. L., Dill, K. A., & Hünenberger, P. H. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4826261 · Cited by 234
Efficient Determination of Protein–Protein Standard Binding Free Energies from First Principles
Gumbart, J. C., Roux, B., & Chipot, C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400273t · Cited by 211
Self-citationCui, Q., Sulea, T., Schrag, J. D., Munger, C., Hung, M.-N., Naïm, M., Cygler, M., & Purisima, E. O. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.035 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, Y., & Roux, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-07-20
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1255-1273
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2037652551
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.