Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Robust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods?

Neese, Frank, Valeev, Edward F.·2011·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

The performance of several families of basis sets for correlated wave function calculations on molecules is studied. The widely used correlation-consistent basis set family cc-pVXZ (n = D, T, Q, 5) is compared to a systematic series of atomic natural orbital basis sets (ano-pVXZ). These basis sets are built from the cc-pV6Z primitives in atomic multireference average coupled pair functional (MR-ACPF) calculations. Segmented basis sets optimized for self-consistent field calculations (def2-SVP, def2-TZVPP, and def2-QZVPP as well as "pc-n", n = 1, 2, 3) were also tested. Reference Hartree-Fock energies are determined with the uncontracted aug-cc-pV6Z basis set for a set of 21 small molecules built from H, B, C, N, O, and F. Reference coupled cluster CCSD(T) correlation energies were determined from extrapolation at the cc-pV5Z/cc-pV6Z level. It is found that the ano-pVXZ basis sets outperform the other basis sets. The error in the SCF energies compared to cc-pVXZ basis sets is reduced by about a factor of 3 at each cardinal number. In addition, the ano-pVXZ consistently recovers more correlation energy than their competitors at each cardinal number. The ability of the four families of basis sets to extrapolate SCF and correlation energies to the basis set limit has been investigated. A conclusion by Truhlar is confirmed that the optimum exponent for correlation energy extrapolations at the DZ/TZ level is ∼2.4. All TZ/QZ basis set pairs lead to an optimum exponent close to the expected value of 3. The SCF energy extrapolation proposed by Petersson and co-workers is found to be effective. At the DZ/TZ level, errors in total energies of less than 2 mEh are found for the test set, while at the TZ/QZ level one obtains the total energies within ∼0.3 mEh of the basis set limit. For extrapolation, the "cc" and "ano" bases are found to be similarly successful. Extrapolation results were compared to explicitly correlated calculations with dedicated basis sets (cc-pVXZ-F12) as well as the ano-pVXZ bases. It is found that the ano-pVXZ+ basis sets perform as well as the cc-pVXZ-F12 family (both are of comparable size); additional improvement should be possible by reoptimizing the ANO basis sets for explicitly correlated calculations. The error of the extrapolated energies is about 2-3 times smaller than what was found in the explicitly correlated calculations. However, the error in the explicitly correlated calculations is more systematic, and hence the same conclusion may not hold for the computation of energy differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct100396y

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Neese, F., & Valeev, E. F.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
33-43
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2318775199
Cited by
409
References
3
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Robust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct100396y
The paper
Neese, F., & Valeev, E. F. (2011). Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Robust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods? Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100396y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.