The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of the Performance of DFT and DFT-D Methods for Describing Distance Dependence of Hydrogen-Bonded Interactions
Abstract
Noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, and π-π interactions play important roles influencing the structure, stability, and dynamic properties of biomolecules including DNA and RNA base pairs. In an effort to better understand the fundamental physics of hydrogen bonding (H-bonding), we investigate the distance dependence of interaction energies in the prototype bimolecular complexes of formic acid, formamide, and formamidine. Potential energy curves along the H-bonding dissociation coordinate are examined both by establishing reference CCSD(T) interaction energies extrapolated to the complete basis set limit and by assessing the performance of the density functional methods B3LYP, PBE, PBE0, B970, PB86, M05-2X, and M06-2X and empirical dispersion corrected methods B3LYP-D3, PBE-D3, PBE0-D3, B970-D2, BP86-D3, and ωB97X-D, with basis sets 6-311++G(3df,3pd), aug-cc-pVDZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ. Although H-bonding interactions are dominated by electrostatics, it is necessary to properly account for dispersion interactions to obtain accurate energetics. In order to quantitatively probe the nature of hydrogen bonding interactions as a function of distance, we decompose the interaction energy curves into physically meaningful components with symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT). The SAPT results confirm that the contribution of dispersion and induction are significant at and near equilibrium, although electrostatics dominate. Among the DFT/DFT-D techniques, the best overall results are obtained utilizing counterpoise-corrected ωB97X-D with the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior
Becke, A. D. (1988) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.38.3098 · Cited by 53,711
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction
Grimme, S. (2006) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20495 · Cited by 31,038
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x · Cited by 30,302
Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F., & Frisch, M. J. (1994) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100096a001 · Cited by 23,248
Boys, S. F., & Bernardi, F. (1970) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268977000101561 · Cited by 22,188
Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas
Perdew, J. P. (1986) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.33.8822 · Cited by 18,777
Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions
Kendall, R. A., Dunning, T. H., & Harrison, R. J. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462569 · Cited by 15,496
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Less is more: Sampling chemical space with active learning
Smith, J. S., Nebgen, B., Lubbers, N., Isayev, O., & Roitberg, A. E. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5023802 · Cited by 811
Benchmark Calculations of Interaction Energies in Noncovalent Complexes and Their Applications
Řezáč, J., & Hobza, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00526 · Cited by 455
Reactive force fields for aqueous and interfacial magnesium carbonate formation
Zare, S., & Qomi, M. J. A. (2021) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d1cp02627e · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Thanthiriwatte, K. S., Hohenstein, E. G., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-12-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-96
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2331368237
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the Performance of DFT and DFT-D Methods for Describing Distance Dependence of Hydrogen-Bonded Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct100469b
- The paper
- Thanthiriwatte, K. S., Hohenstein, E. G., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D. (2011). Assessment of the Performance of DFT and DFT-D Methods for Describing Distance Dependence of Hydrogen-Bonded Interactions. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100469b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.