The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convergent Partially Augmented Basis Sets for Post-Hartree−Fock Calculations of Molecular Properties and Reaction Barrier Heights
Open accessAbstract
We present sets of convergent, partially augmented basis set levels corresponding to subsets of the augmented "aug-cc-pV(n+d)Z" basis sets of Dunning and co-workers. We show that for many molecular properties a basis set fully augmented with diffuse functions is computationally expensive and almost always unnecessary. On the other hand, unaugmented cc-pV(n+d)Z basis sets are insufficient for many properties that require diffuse functions. Therefore, we propose using intermediate basis sets. We developed an efficient strategy for partial augmentation, and in this article, we test it and validate it. Sequentially deleting diffuse basis functions from the "aug" basis sets yields the "jul", "jun", "may", "apr", etc. basis sets. Tests of these basis sets for Møller-Plesset second-order perturbation theory (MP2) show the advantages of using these partially augmented basis sets and allow us to recommend which basis sets offer the best accuracy for a given number of basis functions for calculations on large systems. Similar truncations in the diffuse space can be performed for the aug-cc-pVxZ, aug-cc-pCVxZ, etc. basis sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Boys, S. F., & Bernardi, F. (1970) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268977000101561 · Cited by 22,188
Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions
Kendall, R. A., Dunning, T. H., & Harrison, R. J. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462569 · Cited by 15,496
Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems
Møller, C., & Plesset, M. S. (1934) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.46.618 · Cited by 14,614
Woon, D. E., & Dunning, T. H. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464303 · Cited by 9,493
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets
Frisch, M. J., Pople, J. A., & Binkley, J. S. (1984) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.447079 · Cited by 8,561
A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories
Raghavachari, K., Trucks, G. W., Pople, J. A., & Head-Gordon, M. (1989) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6 · Cited by 8,504
Clark, T., Chandrasekhar, J., Spitznagel, G. W., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (1983) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540040303 · Cited by 7,224
Hehre, W. J., Stewart, R. F., & Pople, J. A. (1969) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1672392 · Cited by 4,204
Woon, D. E., & Dunning, T. H. (1994) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.466439 · Cited by 2,618
Metadata
- Authors
- Papajak, E., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-12-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-18
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2009846017
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convergent Partially Augmented Basis Sets for Post-Hartree−Fock Calculations of Molecular Properties and Reaction Barrier Heights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct1005533
- The paper
- Papajak, E., & Truhlar, D. G. (2011). Convergent Partially Augmented Basis Sets for Post-Hartree−Fock Calculations of Molecular Properties and Reaction Barrier Heights. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct1005533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.