The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing Protein−Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides
Open accessAbstract
While most force field efforts in biomolecular simulation have focused on the parametrization of the protein, relatively little attention has been paid to the quality of the accompanying solvent model. These considerations are especially relevant for simulations of intrinsically disordered peptides and proteins, for which energy differences between conformations are small and interactions with water are enhanced. In this work, we investigate the accuracy of the AMBER ff99SB force field when combined with the standard TIP3P model or the more recent TIP4P-Ew water model, to generate conformational ensembles for disordered trialanine (Ala3), triglycine (Gly3), and trivaline (Val3) peptides. We find that the TIP4P-Ew water model yields significantly better agreement with experimentally measured scalar couplings-and therefore more accurate conformational ensembles-for both Ala3 and Gly3. For Val3, however, we find that the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew ensembles are equivalent in their performance. To further improve the protein-water force field combination and obtain more accurate intrinsic conformational preferences, we derive a straightforward perturbation to the ϕ' backbone dihedral potential that shifts the β-PPII equilibrium. We find that the revised ϕ' backbone dihedral potential yields improved conformational ensembles for a variety of small peptides and maintains the stability of the globular ubiquitin protein in TIP4P-Ew water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions
Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1589 · Cited by 3,871
Lipari, G., & Szabo, A. (1982) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00381a009 · Cited by 3,777
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163
Cited by
Improved Peptide and Protein Torsional Energetics with the OPLS-AA Force Field
Robertson, M. J., Tirado-Rives, J., & Jorgensen, W. L. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00356 · Cited by 854
Piana, S., Donchev, A. G., Robustelli, P., & Shaw, D. E. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp508971m · Cited by 852
Jämbeck, J. P. M., & Lyubartsev, A. P. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp212503e · Cited by 527
To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding
Lane, T. J., Shukla, D., Beauchamp, K. A., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2012.11.002 · Cited by 409
Temperature-dependent solvation modulates the dimensions of disordered proteins
Wuttke, R., Hofmann, H., Nettels, D., Borgia, M. B., Mittal, J., Best, R. B., & Schuler, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313006111 · Cited by 192
Finding Our Way in the Dark Proteome
Bhowmick, A., Brookes, D. H., Yost, S. R., Dyson, H. J., Forman-Kay, J. D., Gunter, D., Head-Gordon, M., Hura, G. L., Pande, V. S., Wemmer, D. E., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b06543 · Cited by 128
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerenberg, P. S., & Head-Gordon, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1220-1230
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2327421019
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.