The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polarizable Atomic Multipole-Based Molecular Mechanics for Organic Molecules
Open accessAbstract
An empirical potential based on permanent atomic multipoles and atomic induced dipoles is reported for alkanes, alcohols, amines, sulfides, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, amides, aromatics and other small organic molecules. Permanent atomic multipole moments through quadrupole moments have been derived from gas phase ab initio molecular orbital calculations. The van der Waals parameters are obtained by fitting to gas phase homodimer QM energies and structures, as well as experimental densities and heats of vaporization of neat liquids. As a validation, the hydrogen bonding energies and structures of gas phase heterodimers with water are evaluated using the resulting potential. For 32 homo- and heterodimers, the association energy agrees with ab initio results to within 0.4 kcal/mol. The RMS deviation of hydrogen bond distance from QM optimized geometry is less than 0.06 Å. In addition, liquid self-diffusion and static dielectric constants computed from molecular dynamics simulation are consistent with experimental values. The force field is also used to compute the solvation free energy of 27 compounds not included in the parameterization process, with a RMS error of 0.69 kcal/mol. The results obtained in this study suggest the AMOEBA force field performs well across different environments and phases. The key algorithms involved in the electrostatic model and a protocol for developing parameters are detailed to facilitate extension to additional molecular systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationSimulation of Ca2+ and Mg2+ Solvation Using Polarizable Atomic Multipole Potential
Jiao, D., King, C., Grossfield, A., Darden, T. A., & Ren, P. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp062230r · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Cited by
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationClassical Electrostatics for Biomolecular Simulations
Cisneros, G. A., Karttunen, M., Ren, P., & Sagui, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300461d · Cited by 259
Self-citationHuggins, D. J., Biggin, P. C., Dämgen, M. A., Essex, J. W., Harris, S. A., Henchman, R. H., Khalid, S., Kuzmanic, A., Laughton, C. A., Michel, J., et al. (2019) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1393 · Cited by 169
Craddock, T. J. A., Kurian, P., Preto, J., Sahu, K., Hameroff, S. R., Klobukowski, M., & Tuszynski, J. A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09992-7 · Cited by 109
The many-body expansion combined with neural networks
Yao, K., Herr, J. E., & Parkhill, J. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4973380 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Ren, P., Wu, C., & Ponder, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3143-3161
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1992531741
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.