Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unifying General and Segmented Contracted Basis Sets. Segmented Polarization Consistent Basis Sets

Jensen, Frank·2014·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

We propose a method, denoted P-orthogonalization, for converting a general contracted basis set to a computationally more efficient segmented contracted basis set, while inheriting the full accuracy of the general contracted basis set. The procedure can be used for any general contracted basis set to remove the redundancies between general contracted functions in terms of primitive functions. The P-orthogonalization procedure is used to construct a segmented contracted version of the polarization consistent basis sets, which are optimized for density functional theory calculations. Benchmark calculations show that the new pcs-n basis sets provide uniform error control of the basis set incompleteness for molecular systems composed of atoms from the first three rows in the periodic table (H-Kr) and for different exchange-correlation functionals. The basis set errors at a given zeta quality level are lower than other existing basis sets, and the pcs-n basis sets are furthermore shown to be among the computationally most efficient. The pcs-n basis sets are available in qualities ranging from (unpolarized) double-zeta to pentuple zeta quality and should therefore be well suited for both routine and benchmark calculations using density functional theory methods in general.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct401026a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, F.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2014-02-27
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1074-1085
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2322763888
Cited by
332
References
4
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.