Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polarizable Force Fields: History, Test Cases, and Prospects

Warshel, Arieh, Kato, Mitsunori, Pisliakov, Andrei V.·2007·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

A consistent treatment of electrostatic energies is arguably the most important requirement for the realistic modeling of biological systems. An important part of electrostatic modeling is the ability to account for the polarizability of the simulated system. This can be done both macroscopically and microscopically, but the use of macroscopic models may lead to conceptual traps, which do not exist in the microscopic treatments. The present work describes the development of microscopic polarizable force fields starting with the introduction of these powerful tools and following some of the subsequent developments in the field. Special effort has been made to review a wide range of applications and emphasize cases when the use of polarizable force fields is important. Finally, a brief perspective is given on the future of this rapidly growing field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct700127w

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Warshel, A., Kato, M., & Pisliakov, A. V.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2007-09-25
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
2034-2045
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2048094270
Cited by
377
References
0
FWCI
16.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.