The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geometries of Second-Row Transition-Metal Complexes from Density-Functional Theory
Abstract
A data set of 19 second-row transition-metal complexes has been collated from sufficiently precise gas-phase electron-diffraction experiments and used for evaluating errors in DFT optimized geometries. Equilibrium geometries have been computed using 15 different combinations of exchange-correlation functionals in conjunction with up to three different effective core potentials. Most DFT levels beyond the local density approximation can reproduce the 29 metal−ligand bond distances selected in this set with reasonable accuracy and precision, as assessed by the mean and standard deviations of optimized vs experimentally observed bond lengths. The pure GGAs tested in this study all have larger standard deviations than their corresponding hybrid variants. In contrast to previous findings for first-row transition-metal complexes, the TPSSh hybrid meta-GGA is slightly inferior to the best hybrid GGAs. The ranking of some popular density functionals, for second-row transition-metal complexes, ordered according to decreasing standard deviation, is VSXC ≈ LSDA > BLYP > BP86 > B3LYP ≈ TPSSh > PBE hybrid ≈ B3PW91 ≈ B3P86. When zero-point vibrational corrections, computed at the BP86/SDD level, are added to equilibrium bond distances obtained from a number of density-functional/basis-set combinations, the overall performance in terms of mean and standard deviations from experiment is not improved. For a combined data set comprised of the first- and second-row transition-metal complexes the hybrid functionals B3P86, B3PW91, and the meta-GGA hybrid TPSSh afford the lowest standard deviations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nandy, A., Duan, C., Taylor, M. G., Liu, F., Steeves, A. H., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 · Cited by 358
Roy, L. E., Jakubikova, E., Guthrie, M. G., & Batista, E. R. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp811388w · Cited by 311
Biaso, F., Burlat, B., & Guigliarelli, B. (2012) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic201533p · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Waller, M. P., Braun, H., Hojdis, N., & Bühl, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-10-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2234-2242
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W4251590878
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.