The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Mindless” DFT Benchmarking
Abstract
A diversity-oriented approach for the generation of thermochemical benchmark sets is presented. Test sets consisting of randomly generated "artificial molecules" (AMs) are proposed that rely on systematic constraints rather than uncontrolled chemical biases. In this way, the narrow structural space of chemical intuition is opened up and electronically difficult cases can be produced in an unforeseeable manner. For the calculation of chemically meaningful relative energies, AMs are systematically decomposed into small molecules (hydrides and diatomics). Two different example test sets containing eight-atom, single-reference, main group AMs with chemically very diverse and unusual structures are generated. Highly accurate all-electron, estimated CCSD(T)/complete basis set reference energies are also provided. They are used to benchmark the density functionals S-VWN, BP86, B-LYP, B97-D, PBE, TPSS, PBEh, BH-LYP, B3-PW91, B3-LYP, B2-PLYP, B2GP-PLYP, BMK, MPW1B95, M05, M05-2X, PW6B95, M06, M06-L, and M06-2X. In selected cases, an empirical dispersion correction (DFT-D) has been applied. Due to the composition of the sets, it is expected that a good performance indicates "robustness" in many different chemical applications. The results of a statistical analysis of the errors for the entire set with 165 entries (average reaction energy of 117 kcal/mol, dubbed as the MB08-165 set) perfectly fit to the "Jacob's ladder" metaphor for the ordering of density functionals according to their theoretical complexity. The mean absolute deviation (MAD) decreases very strongly from LDA (20 kcal/mol) to GGAs (MAD of about 10 kcal/mol) but then was less pronounced to hybrid-GGAs (MAD of about 6-8 kcal/mol). The best performance (MAD of 4.1-4.2 kcal/mol) is found for the (fifth-rung) double-hybrid functionals B2-PLYP-D and B2GP-PLYP-D, followed by the M06-2X meta-hybrid (MAD of 4.8 kcal/mol). The significance of the proposed approach for thermodynamic benchmarking is discussed and related to the observed performance ranking also regarding wave function based methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Self-citationDensity functional theory with London dispersion corrections
Grimme, S. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.30 · Cited by 2,829
Self-citationQuantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules
Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2014) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2014.22 · Cited by 1,966
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Molecule‐Specific Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Chemical Studies
Reiher, M. (2022) · Israel Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ijch.202100101 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Korth, M., & Grimme, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 993-1003
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2111004309
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Mindless” DFT Benchmarking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct800511q
- The paper
- Korth, M., & Grimme, S. (2009). “Mindless” DFT Benchmarking. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct800511q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.