Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Investigation of Exchange Energy Density Functional Accuracy for Interacting Molecules

Murray, Éamonn D., Lee, Kyuho, Langreth, David C.·2009·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

We present a comparison of exchange-only interaction energies obtained using several standard exchange functionals in the generalized gradient approximation to Hartree-Fock results for interacting molecules. We observe that functionals with an enhancement factor using a 2/5 power dependence on the gradient of the density for large density gradients offer consistently better agreement with Hartree-Fock calculations than that of alternative functionals. We revisit the functional offering the closest agreement and recalculate it to include its exact large gradient dependence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct900365q

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Murray, É. D., Lee, K., & Langreth, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2009-09-09
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
2754-2762
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2016403501
Cited by
323
References
0
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of Exchange Energy Density Functional Accuracy for Interacting Molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct900365q
The paper
Murray, É. D., Lee, K., & Langreth, D. C. (2009). Investigation of Exchange Energy Density Functional Accuracy for Interacting Molecules. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900365q

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.