Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Saturated and cis-Monounsaturated Phosphatidylcholine Lipid Bilayers: A Comparison with Experiment

Poger, David, Mark, Alan E.·2010·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of fully hydrated pure bilayers of four widely studied phospholipids, 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), and 2-oleoyl-1-palmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) using a recent revision of the GROMOS96 force field are reported. It is shown that the force field reproduces the structure and the hydration of bilayers formed by each of the four lipids with high accuracy. Specifically, the solvation and the orientation of the dipole of the phosphocholine headgroup and of the ester carbonyls show that the structure of the primary hydration shell in the simulations closely matches experimental findings. This work highlights the need to reproduce a broad range of properties beyond the area per lipid, which is poorly defined experimentally, and to consider the effect of system size and sampling times well beyond those commonly used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct900487a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Poger, D., & Mark, A. E.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2009-11-23
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
325-336
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2035939859
Cited by
306
References
4
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.