The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent advances in the concept of hard and soft acids and bases
Abstract
The hard / soft acids / bases principle has been justifiably criticized because of the lack of a precise definition of hardness and the inability to quantify this property; recent developments have overcome these objections, however.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hard and soft acids and bases—The evolution of a chemical concept
Pearson, R. G. (1990) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/0010-8545(90)85016-l · Cited by 886
Self-citationConceptual density functional theory: status, prospects, issues
Geerlings, P., Chamorro, E., Chattaraj, P. K., De Proft, F., Gázquez, J. L., Liu, S., Morell, C., Toro-Labbé, A., Vela, A., & Ayers, P. (2020) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-020-2546-7 · Cited by 459
Activation of Carbonyl-Containing Molecules with Solid Lewis Acids in Aqueous Media
Román-Leshkov, Y., & Davis, M. E. (2011) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200411d · Cited by 401
Formation and signaling actions of electrophilic lipids
Schopfer, F. J., Cipollina, C., & Freeman, B. A. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200131e · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 561
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W2036503595
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in the concept of hard and soft acids and bases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ed064p561
- The paper
- Pearson, R. G. (1987). Recent advances in the concept of hard and soft acids and bases. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed064p561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
