The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students
Abstract
This manuscript (i) presents the Chemical Concepts Inventory (CCI), an inventory that faculty can use to judge for themselves the extent of several common alternate conceptions among their students; (ii) demonstrates that students come to general chemistry with a variety of the alternate conceptions described in the chemical and science education research literature; and (iii) shows that a traditional general chemistry course results in only modest improvements in understanding of basic concepts. The incorrect concepts include inappropriate ideas about atoms and molecules, microscopic behavior, heat and temperature, chemical formulas, gases, and other qualitative concepts—concepts that form the foundation of several topics of first-semester college chemistry. The inventory is a multiple choice instrument composed of one- and two-tiered nonmathematical questions based on alternate conceptions reported in the science education literature. Administration of the inventory before the first semester of a two-semester general chemistry course for science and engineering majors confirmed that students hold many alternate conceptions in diverse areas of chemistry prior to the course. An administration of the inventory at the beginning of the second semester indicated that these students retained many of their alternate conceptions through a semester of instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science
Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015) · EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a · Cited by 432
Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol
Laverty, J. T., Underwood, S. M., Matz, R. L., Posey, L. A., Carmel, J. H., Caballero, M. D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Ebert-May, D., Jardeleza, S. E., & Cooper, M. M. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162333 · Cited by 262
Stanich, C. A., Pelch, M. A., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c8rp00044a · Cited by 72
Eren-Sisman, E. N., Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c7rp00201g · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulford, D. R., & Robinson, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 739
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W1978989105
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ed079p739
- The paper
- Mulford, D. R., & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An Inventory for Alternate Conceptions among First-Semester General Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.