The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modifying and Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Use in Chemistry
Abstract
The chemistry version of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS-Chem) is a new instrument designed to measure students' (novices') beliefs about chemistry and learning chemistry compared to those of experts (instructors). This survey is intended to measure the effects of students' beliefs on learning, and to understand how educational practices influence these beliefs in order to guide chemistry instruction. This instrument is a modification of a survey validated and extensively used in physics. The CLASS-Chem survey addresses a range of beliefs, including how chemists think about visualization, chemical reactivity, and molecular structure. The survey statements are validated using student interviews to ensure clarity in interpretation and response. Faculty testing of the statements is performed to ensure consistency in the "expert" response. Statements are grouped into statistically robust categories of student thinking. Preliminary use of the survey shows that most traditional chemistry teaching practices cause declines in student beliefs over the course of one semester and that students' self-reported major status correlates with their "Overall" and "Personal Interest" score on the survey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking
Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2011) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 · Cited by 451
Self-citationStanich, C. A., Pelch, M. A., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c8rp00044a · Cited by 72
Stevens, L. M., & Hoskins, S. G. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0239 · Cited by 62
Assessing an effective undergraduate module teaching applied bioinformatics to biology students
Madlung, A. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005872 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, W. K., Wieman, C. E., Perkins, K. K., & Barbera, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1435
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W2092446142
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modifying and Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Use in Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ed085p1435
- The paper
- Adams, W. K., Wieman, C. E., Perkins, K. K., & Barbera, J. (2008). Modifying and Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Use in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p1435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.