Undergraduate Oral Examinations in a University Organic Chemistry Curriculum
Abstract
This article describes the successful implementation of an oral examination format in the organic chemistry curriculum at the University of Toronto. Oral examinations are used to replace traditional written midterm examinations in several courses. In an introductory organic class, each student is allotted 15 min to individually discuss one pre-selected “named” reaction with the course instructors. To stimulate further learning, students must choose a particular reaction that has not been presented during lecture or performed in the laboratory. In upper-level courses, students review selected literature syntheses of either a drug molecule or natural product. The oral examination format provides a dynamic assessment approach that can be individualized to facilitate an in-depth analysis of student comprehension.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students often perform better in oral assessments compared to written examinations.
“Research indicates that students often perform better in oral assessments compared to written examinations (Burke-Smalley, 2014;Dicks et al., 2012;Huxham et al., 2012)”
From Replacing Traditional Written Laboratory Reports with Interactive Oral Assessments: Enhancing Laboratory Skill Assessment in Undergraduate Genetics Education (2026) · cites this paper as Dicks et al., 2012
Cites
Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model
Garrison, D. R. (1997) · Adult Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/074171369704800103 · Cited by 1,578 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Della Vedova, C. B., Birbeck, D., & Davey, S. K. (2026) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-026-10380-3
- Authors
- Dicks, A. P., Lautens, M., Koroluk, K. J., & Skonieczny, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3H6
- Corresponding author
- Dicks, Andrew P.
- Lautens, Mark
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-10-18
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1506-1510
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W2035894125
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Faculty of Arts and Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- oral examination, organic chemistry curriculum, undergraduate assessment, named reactions, student presentations, drug synthesis, natural product synthesis, individualized assessment, dynamic assessment, University of Toronto
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review