Cited by 113Educational Assessment and PedagogyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingStudent Assessment and Feedback

Guide To Developing High-Quality, Reliable, and Valid Multiple-Choice Assessments

Open access
Towns, Marcy H.·2014·Journal of Chemical Education

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Chemistry faculty members are highly skilled in obtaining, analyzing, and interpreting physical measurements, but often they are less skilled in measuring student learning. This work provides guidance for chemistry faculty from the research literature on multiple-choice item development in chemistry. Areas covered include content, stem, and response construction; item analysis; item difficulty; and item discrimination. The goal is to help faculty construct high-quality, reliable, and valid multiple-choice items to evaluate students’ ability to meet learning objectives and to demonstrate proficiency in the content domain under study. Using item-writing guidelines based upon the research literature allows faculty to create assessments that are reliable and valid, with greater ability to discriminate between high- and low-achieving students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ed500076x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Towns, M. H.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Towns, Marcy H.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2014-07-31
Volume
91
Issue
9
Pages
1426-1431
ISSN
  • 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1328
OpenAlex
W1989277800
Cited by
113
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
22.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
chemistry assessment, item writing guidelines, item difficulty, item discrimination, item analysis, test reliability, test validity, learning objectives, chemistry faculty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review