The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation Pathways for Monoethanolamine in a CO2 Capture Facility
Abstract
One of the highest priorities in carbon sequestration science is the development of techniques for CO 2 separation and capture, because it is expected to account for the majority of the total cost (∼75%). The most common currently used method of CO 2 separation is reversible chemical absorption using monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent. In the current study, solvent degradation from this technique was studied using degraded MEA samples from the IMC Chemicals Facility in Trona, California. A major pathway to solvent degradation that had not been previously observed in laboratory experiments has been identified. This pathway, which is initiated by oxidation of the solvent, is a much more significant source of solvent degradation than the previously identified carbamate dimerization mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxidative Degradation of Monoethanolamine
Chi, S., & Rochelle, G. T. (2002) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie010697c · Cited by 343
Annual energy outlook 1997 with projections to 2015
USDOE Energy Information Administration, W. (1996) · doi:10.2172/414326 · Cited by 307
Research and development issues in CO2 capture
Meisen, A., & Shuai, X. (1997) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/s0196-8904(96)00242-7 · Cited by 235
The Kerr-McGee/ABB Lummus Crest technology for the recovery of CO2 from stack gases
Barchas, R., & Davis, R. (1992) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/0196-8904(92)90028-u · Cited by 119
The Fluor Daniel® econamine FG process: Past experience and present day focus
Sander, M., & Mariz, C. L. (1992) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/0196-8904(92)90029-v · Cited by 88
Cited by
CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications – A review
Olajire, A. A. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.030 · Cited by 1,217
Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Postcombustion CO 2 Capture: A Critical Review
Creamer, A. E., & Gao, B. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00627 · Cited by 598
Amine degradation in CO2 capture. I. A review
Gouedard, C., Picq, D., Launay, F., & Carrette, P.-L. (2012) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.015 · Cited by 560
Koornneef, J., van Keulen, T., Faaij, A., & Turkenburg, W. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.008 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Strazisar, B. R., Anderson, R. R., & White, C. M.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-06-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1034-1039
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2145009485
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
