Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photocatalytic Water Splitting over Pt−TiO2 in the Presence of Sacrificial Reagents

Galińska, Anna, Walendziewski, Jerzy·2005·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Hydrogen production by water splitting over a Pt−TiO 2 catalyst has been studied. The main goal of the studies was to examine the influence of sacrificial reagents on the photocatalytic efficiency in water splitting reactions under ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. Various sacrificial reagents, such as methanol, Na 2 S, and ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), as well as I - and IO 3 - ions, were used to obtain an effective water splitting to H and O atoms. It was revealed that, in the case of using methanol as the sacrificial reagent, hydrogen evolution is also a result of methanol conversion. Photocatalytic water splitting was obtained when EDTA and Na 2 S were used as the sacrificial reagents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef0400619

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Galińska, A., & Walendziewski, J.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2005-03-25
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
1143-1147
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2030217248
Cited by
384
References
0
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.