The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NOx Emissions of Alternative Diesel Fuels: A Comparative Analysis of Biodiesel and FT Diesel
Abstract
This study explores the diesel injection and combustion processes in an effort to better understand the differences in NO x emissions between biodiesel, Fischer−Tropsch (FT) diesel, and their blends with a conventional diesel fuel. Emissions studies were performed with each fuel at a variety of static fuel injection timing conditions in a single-cylinder DI diesel engine with a mechanically controlled, in-line, pump-line-nozzle fuel injection system. The dynamic start of injection (SOI) timing correlated well with bulk modulus measurements made on the fuel blends. The high bulk modulus of soy-derived biodiesel blends produced an advance in SOI timing compared to conventional diesel fuel of up to 1.1 crank angle degrees, and the lower bulk modulus of the FT diesel produced a delay in SOI timing of up to 2.4 crank angle degrees. Compared to conventional diesel fuel at high load, biodiesel fuel blends produced increases in NO x emissions of 6−9% while FT fuels caused NO x emissions to decrease 21−22%. Shifts in fuel injection timing, caused by bulk modulus differences, were largely responsible for the NO x increases, but pure FT diesel produced lower NO x emissions than expected on the basis of SOI alone. Further analysis showed that no trends were seen between NO x and either ignition delay or maximum cylinder temperature, and only weak, or fuel-specific, relationships were seen between NO x and maximum heat release rate and the timing of maximum heat release rate. The timing of the maximum cylinder temperature, however, did produce a relationship with NO x emissions that was not dependent on fuel type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions
Lapuerta, M., Armas, O., & Rodríguez-Fernández, J. (2008) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2007.07.001 · Cited by 1,873
Effect of biodiesel on engine performances and emissions
Xue, J., Grift, T. E., & Hansen, A. C. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.016 · Cited by 1,298
Catalytic Alkane Metathesis by Tandem Alkane Dehydrogenation-Olefin Metathesis
Goldman, A. S., Roy, A. H., Huang, Z., Ahuja, R., Schinski, W., & Brookhart, M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123787 · Cited by 586
Bergthorson, J. M., & Thomson, M. J. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.034 · Cited by 427
Dominković, D. F., Bačeković, I., Pedersen, A. S., & Krajačić, G. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.117 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Szybist, J. P., Kirby, S. R., & Boehman, A. L.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1484-1492
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W1965179579
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NOx Emissions of Alternative Diesel Fuels: A Comparative Analysis of Biodiesel and FT Diesel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef049702q
- The paper
- Szybist, J. P., Kirby, S. R., & Boehman, A. L. (2005). NOx Emissions of Alternative Diesel Fuels: A Comparative Analysis of Biodiesel and FT Diesel. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049702q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.