Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impregnated CuO/Al2O3 Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Combustion: Avoiding Fluidized Bed Agglomeration

de Diego, Luis F., Gayán, Pilar, García-Labiano, Francisco, Celaya, Javier, Abad, Alberto, Adánez, Juan·2005·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is a combustion technology with inherent separation of the greenhouse gas CO 2 that involves the use of an oxygen carrier, which transfers oxygen from air to the fuel avoiding the direct contact between them. An oxygen carrier in a CLC power plant must show high reaction rates and sufficient durability in successive cycle reactions. Furthermore, the oxygen carrier particles must not agglomerate. To produce materials with these characteristics, different Cu-based oxygen carriers with a range of CuO content between 10 and 26 wt % were prepared by impregnation using alumina as support. The particles were calcined at different temperatures in the range of 550−950 °C. The oxygen carriers were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray, and thermogravimetry. The samples were evaluated in a fluidized bed facility in order to determine their behavior in multicycle reduction−oxidation tests . A number of 100 cycles was done when the carrier did not agglomerate. The effects of metal content, calcination temperature, and method of preparation on the oxygen carriers reactivity, gas product distribution, attrition rate, and agglomeration were analyzed for the different oxygen carriers. It was observed that the CuO content in the oxygen carrier, the calcination temperature used in the preparation, and the conversion reached by the oxygen carrier during the reduction period affected the agglomeration process. In this work, the preparation conditions to produce Cu-based oxygen carriers with high reactivities, and small attrition rates were found. Moreover, the agglomeration of these oxygen carriers in the fluidized reactor, which is the main reason adduced in the literature to reject the Cu-based oxygen carriers for the CLC process, was avoided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef050052f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
de Diego, L. F., Gayán, P., García-Labiano, F., Celaya, J., Abad, A., & Adánez, J.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1850-1856
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2084309919
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.