The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detailed Modeling of Biomass Gasification in Dual Fluidized Bed Reactors under Aspen Plus
Abstract
The modeling of biomass gasification processes by simulators such as Aspen Plus is a powerful tool to assess mass and energy balances and to optimize process designs. A detailed model of the gasification reactor is one of the key points to achieve an accurate process description. A model for biomass gasification in dual fluidized bed (DFB) reactors by coupling Aspen Plus and dedicated Fortran files is presented. The DFB is divided into three modules according to the main chemical phenomena: biomass pyrolysis, secondary reactions, and char combustion. Mass yields of permanent gases, water, 10 tar species, and char are modeled with respect to the reactor temperature by a pyrolysis correlation. The secondary reactions are modeled by a semidetailed kinetic mechanism that handles gas-phase and catalytic conversions over char of CH 4 and lumped tar species (phenol, naphthalene, benzene, and toluene), gas-phase water–gas shift reaction (WGSR), char, and soot–steam gasification. The calculated compositions of permanent gases and tars, flow rates, and lower heating values are compared with experimental data for two DFB technologies (Tunzini Nessi Equipment Companies (TNEE) and Battelle High Throughput Gasification Process (FERCO)). The syngas composition and flow rate are very sensitive to the WGSR kinetic. The rate laws for WGSR are reviewed. An optimized kinetic law for WGSR is given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spath, P., Aden, A., Eggeman, T., Ringer, M., Wallace, B., & Jechura, J. (2005) · doi:10.2172/15016221 · Cited by 299
Cited by
An overview of advances in biomass gasification
Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Clough, P., Yao, J., Zhong, X., Memon, M. Z., Shah, N., Anthony, E. J., & Fennell, P. S. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee00935b · Cited by 1,258
A review of biomass gasification modelling
Safarian, S., Unnþórsson, R., & Richter, C. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.003 · Cited by 404
Chai, Y., Gao, N., Wang, M., & Wu, C. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122947 · Cited by 265
Fernanda Rojas Michaga, M., Michailos, S., Akram, M., Cardozo, E., Hughes, K. J., Ingham, D., & Pourkashanian, M. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115346 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdelouahed, L., Authier, O., Mauviel, G., Corriou, J. P., Verdier, G., & Dufour, A.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3840-3855
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W1965039030
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detailed Modeling of Biomass Gasification in Dual Fluidized Bed Reactors under Aspen Plus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef300411k
- The paper
- Abdelouahed, L., Authier, O., Mauviel, G., Corriou, J. P., Verdier, G., & Dufour, A. (2012). Detailed Modeling of Biomass Gasification in Dual Fluidized Bed Reactors under Aspen Plus. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300411k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.