Characterization of Biomass Chars Formed under Different Devolatilization Conditions: Differences between Rice Husk and Eucalyptus
Abstract
A comparison between the properties of chars produced by pyrolysis of rice husk and eucalyptus at different temperatures and heating rates has been performed. Low heating rate (LHR) devolatilization experiments were conducted in a fixed bed reactor at temperatures ranging from 600 to 900 °C, while a fluidized bed reactor was used for preparing chars at high heating rate (HHR) and temperatures of 800 and 900 °C. The morphological changes in carbonaceous solids produced in the different thermal treatments were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectra were obtained to evaluate the degree of char structural order. The chars were characterized by their ultimate analysis, oxygen functional group content, and CO 2 adsorption at 0 °C using the Dubinin–Radushkevich method. The results obtained from the different techniques were contrasted to give an overview of the chemical and physical properties of the biomass char samples studied. The influence of the parent material and char properties on char reactivity toward O 2 and NO reduction was further investigated. It was found that, though rice husk chars have a greater reactivity toward oxygen, the NO reduction ability was significantly higher for the eucalyptus chars.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More round pores are formed during pyrolysis when the temperature increased from 600 °C to 800 °C.
“More round pores are formed during the pyrolysis when the temperature increased from 600 °C to 800 °C (Guerrero et al., 2008).”
From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Guerrero et al., 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction
Nhuchhen, D., Basu, P., & Acharya, B. (2014) · International Journal of Renewable Energy & Biofuels · doi:10.5171/2014.506376 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Strategic use of biochar for CO2 capture and sequestration
Jung, S., Park, Y.-K., & Kwon, E. E. (2019) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2019.04.012 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Yu, J., Sun, L., Berrueco, C., Fidalgo, B., Paterson, N., & Millan, M. (2018) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2018.01.018 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Ghesti, G. F., Silveira, E. A., Guimarães, M. G., Evaristo, R. B. W., & Costa, M. (2022) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.022 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guerrero, M., Ruiz, M. P., Millera, Á., Alzueta, M. U., & Bilbao, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Guerrero, Marta
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-01-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1275-1284
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2022511762
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
- Keywords
- biomass char, rice husk, Eucalyptus, devolatilization, pyrolysis, heating rate, char reactivity, NO reduction, oxygen reduction reaction, char structure, oxygen-containing functional groups, CO2 adsorption, char morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review