The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrodeoxygenation of 4-Methylphenol over Unsupported MoP, MoS2, and MoOx Catalysts
Abstract
A study of the hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of 4-methylphenol over unsupported, low-surface-area MoS 2, MoO 2, MoO 3, and MoP catalysts is reported. With the exception of MoO 3, the catalysts had the same physicochemical properties before and after the 5 h reaction at 623 K and 4.40 MPa H 2 . The used MoO 3 was partially reduced to a mixed oxide containing Mo 4 O 11, MoO 2, and Mo. Compared to the unused MoO 3, the used MoO 3 CO uptake increased by a factor of 100 following the reaction. The partially reduced Mo oxide catalyst had a high conversion for the HDO of 4-methylphenol because of Brønsted acid sites and the formation of anionic vacancies. The catalyst turnover frequency (TOF) based on CO uptake for the HDO of 4-methylphenol decreased in the order MoP > MoS 2 > MoO 2 > MoO 3, while the activation energy increased in the order of MoP < MoS 2 < MoO 2 < MoO 3 . The activity trends correspond to the increased electron density of the Mo among the catalysts. Two primary reactions, C−O hydrogenolysis to yield toluene and saturation of 4-methylphenol followed by rapid dehydration to produce 4-methylcyclohexene, were identified. The catalysts differed in their hydrogenation and isomerization capabilities. The MoP catalyst displayed the highest selectivity toward hydrogenated products, suggesting that the rate-limiting step over MoO 3, MoO 2, and MoS 2 was the saturation of 4-methylphenol to produce 4-methylcyclohexanol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Cited by
Catalytic Transformation of Lignin for the Production of Chemicals and Fuels
Li, C., Zhao, X., Wang, A., Huber, G. W., & Zhang, T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00155 · Cited by 2,951
A review of catalytic upgrading of bio-oil to engine fuels
Mortensen, P. M., Grunwaldt, J.-D., Jensen, P. A., Knudsen, K. G., & Jensen, A. D. (2011) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.046 · Cited by 1,768
Yu, P., Wang, F., Shifa, T. A., Zhan, X., Lou, X., Xia, F., & He, J. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.017 · Cited by 434
Chen, J., Shi, H., Li, L., & Li, K. (2014) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.026 · Cited by 259
Selective deoxygenation of lignin during catalytic fast pyrolysis
Ma, Z., Custodis, V., & van Bokhoven, J. A. (2014) · Catalysis Science & Technology · doi:10.1039/c3cy00704a · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Whiffen, V. M. L., & Smith, K. J.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-19
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4728-4737
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2061696467
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrodeoxygenation of 4-Methylphenol over Unsupported MoP, MoS2, and MoOx Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef901270h
- The paper
- Whiffen, V. M. L., & Smith, K. J. (2010). Hydrodeoxygenation of 4-Methylphenol over Unsupported MoP, MoS2, and MoOx Catalysts. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901270h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.