The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment. Body Residues and Modes Of Toxic Action
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTEnhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment. Body Residues and Modes Of Toxic ActionLynn S. McCarty and Donald MackayCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 9, 1718–1728Publication Date (Print):September 1, 1993Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 September 1993https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es00046a001https://doi.org/10.1021/es00046a001research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1387Altmetric-Citations496LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J., Hoff, D. J., Hornung, M. W., Johnson, R. D., Mount, D. R., Nichols, J. W., Russom, C. L., Schmieder, P. K., et al. (2009) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.34 · Cited by 2,734
Ankley, G. T., Cureton, P., Hoke, R. A., Houde, M., Kumar, A., Kurias, J., Lanno, R., McCarthy, C., Newsted, J., Salice, C. J., et al. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4869 · Cited by 454
Comparing the toxic potency in vivo of long-chain perfluoroalkyl acids and fluorinated alternatives
Gomis, M. I., Vestergren, R., Borg, D., & Cousins, I. T. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.011 · Cited by 438
Assessment of predictive models for estimating the acute aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals
Melnikov, F., Kostal, J., Voutchkova-Kostal, A., Zimmerman, J. B., & T. Anastas, P. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc00720a · Cited by 158
Why Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) Challenge Traditional Risk Assessment and How to Respond
Futran Fuhrman, V., Tal, A., & Arnon, S. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.012 · Cited by 152
Review of the toxicity of chemical mixtures: Theory, policy, and regulatory practice
McCarty, L. S., & Borgert, C. J. (2006) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.03.004 · Cited by 126
Self-citationThe Combined Algae Test for the Evaluation of Mixture Toxicity in Environmental Samples
Glauch, L., & Escher, B. I. (2020) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4873 · Cited by 31
Brinkmann, M., Preuss, T. G., & Hollert, H. (2016) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2015_5015 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- McCarty, L. S., & Mackay, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1718-1728
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1995448239
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.