The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Humic Acid Fouling during Ultrafiltration
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that natural organic matter (e.g., humic and fulvic acids) is a major foulant during ultrafiltration of surface water. The objective of this study was to develop a more complete understanding of the mechanisms governing humic acid fouling, including the effects of humic acid adsorption, concentration polarization, and aggregate deposition on the rate and extent of fouling. Data were obtained with Aldrich and Suwannee River humic acids using ultrafiltration membranes with a broad range of molecular weight cutoffs. Fouled membranes were also examined using streaming potential and contact angle measurements. The extent of flux decline was greatest for the largest molecular weight cutoff membranes due to the greater relative hydraulic resistance of the humic acid deposit formed on the surface of these membranes. This humic acid deposit reduced the apparent zeta potential and increased the membrane contact angle. Simple static adsorption and concentration polarization caused relatively little flux decline. Humic acid aggregates had a significant effect on fouling only for the larger molecular weight cutoff membranes. The rate and extent of humic acid fouling increased at low pH, high ionic strength, and in the presence of calcium due to changes in intermolecular electrostatic interactions. These results provide important insights into the mechanisms of humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review
Gao, W., Liang, H., Ma, J., Han, M., Chen, Z.-L., Han, Z.-S., & Li, G.-B. (2011) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051 · Cited by 913
Modification of polyethersulfone membranes – A review of methods
Zhao, C., Xue, J., Ran, F., & Sun, S. (2013) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.07.002 · Cited by 913
Qu, F., Liang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Yu, H., & Li, G. (2012) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.051 · Cited by 301
Novel anti fouling mixed matrix CeO2/Ce7O12 nanofiltration membranes for heavy metal uptake
Jamil, T. S., Mansor, E. S., Abdallah, H., Shaban, A. M., & Souaya, E. R. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.05.006 · Cited by 51
Kumar, A., Rachamalla, M., & Adarsh, A. (2023) · Metal Organic Frameworks for Wastewater Contaminant Removal · doi:10.1002/9783527841523.ch7 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, W., & Zydney, A. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-10-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 5043-5050
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W3022373910
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.