The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monitoring Natural and Synthetic Estrogens at Activated Sludge Sewage Treatment Plants and in a Receiving River Water
Abstract
Sewage treatment plant (STP) effluents with primarily domestic inputs are strongly suspected to be an important source of natural and synthetic estrogens contaminating the aquatic environment. Even a few ng/L of some of these substances can provoke reproductive disturbances in riverine fish. The main purpose of this investigation has been that of ascertaining whether activated sludge STPs (ASSTPs) are able to produce significant amounts of free estrogens. For this purpose, we have monitored monthly estriol (E 3 ), estradiol (E 2 ), estrone (E 1 ) and ethinylestradiol (EE 2 ) in influents and effluents of six Roman ASSTPs for five months. To do this, we have developed an original analytical method involving analyte extraction with a Carbograph 4 cartridge and LC coupled with negative turbo ion spray tandem mass spectrometry in the selected reaction monitoring mode. Analyte recovery ranged between 86 and 91%, and limits of quantification were below 1 ng/L. Over five months, inlet concentrations of E 3, E 2, E 1 and EE 2 at the six plants averaged respectively 80, 12, 52 and 3.0 ng/L. On the basis of the daily human excretion of conjugated estrogens, the above values suggest that deconjugation occurs preferentially in sewers. The activated sludge treatment efficiently removed E 3 (95%), E 2 (87%), EE 2 (85%), but not E 1 (61%). In four events out of thirty, E 1 outlet levels were even larger than inlet levels. Median concentrations of the two most potent estrogens, that is E 2 and EE 2 leaving the six ASSTPs were respectively 1 and 0.45 ng/L. Analysis of a river (Tiber) water sampled downstream of small towns whose sewages are treated by percolating filter STPs or directly discharged into the river revealed the presence of all four estrogens at levels between 0.04 (EE 2 ) and 1.5 ng/L (E 1 ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Widespread Sexual Disruption in Wild Fish
Jobling, S., Nolan, M., Tyler, C. R., Brighty, G., & Sumpter, J. P. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9710870 · Cited by 2,002
Desbrow, C., Routledge, E. J., Brighty, G. C., Sumpter, J. P., & Waldock, M. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9707973 · Cited by 1,712
Estrogenic Effects of Effluents from Sewage Treatment Works
Purdom, C. E., Hardiman, P. A., Bye, V. V. J., Eno, N. C., Tyler, C. R., & Sumpter, J. P. (1994) · Chemistry and Ecology · doi:10.1080/02757549408038554 · Cited by 1,697
Guidelines for data acquisition and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry
MacDougall, D., Crummett, W. B., & et al. (1980) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50064a004 · Cited by 1,621
Ternes, T. A., Stumpf, M., Mueller, J., Haberer, K., Wilken, R.-D., & Servos, M. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00334-9 · Cited by 1,390
Identification of Estrogenic Chemicals in STW Effluent. 2. In Vivo Responses in Trout and Roach
Routledge, E. J., Sheahan, D., Desbrow, C., Brighty, G. C., Waldock, M., & Sumpter, J. P. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es970796a · Cited by 995
Belfroid, A. C., Van der Horst, A., Vethaak, A. D., Schäfer, A. J., Rijs, G. B. J., Wegener, J., & Cofino, W. P. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00336-2 · Cited by 710
Johnson, A. C., Belfroid, A., & Di Corcia, A. (2000) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00481-2 · Cited by 423
Self-citationEstrogen as an environmental pollutant
Shore, L., Gurevitz, M., & Shemesh, M. (1993) · Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/bf00201753 · Cited by 250
Oestrogenic effects in fish in English rivers with evidence of their causation
Tyler, C. R., & Routledge, E. J. (1998) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac199870091795 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Ecotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals
Fent, K., Weston, A. A., & Caminada, D. (2006) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.09.009 · Cited by 3,223
Heberer, T. (2002) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00041-3 · Cited by 2,995
Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 · Cited by 2,654
Verlicchi, P., Al Aukidy, M., & Zambello, E. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.028 · Cited by 2,183
Metadata
- Authors
- Baronti, C., Curini, R., D'Ascenzo, G., Di Corcia, A., Gentili, A., & Samperi, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-11-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5059-5066
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2071547180
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 20.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring Natural and Synthetic Estrogens at Activated Sludge Sewage Treatment Plants and in a Receiving River Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es001359q
- The paper
- Baronti, C., Curini, R., D'Ascenzo, G., Di Corcia, A., Gentili, A., & Samperi, R. (2000). Monitoring Natural and Synthetic Estrogens at Activated Sludge Sewage Treatment Plants and in a Receiving River Water. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001359q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.