The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Sulfide on Solid-Phase Mercury Bioavailability for Methylation by Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus(1pr3)
Abstract
To help understand the mechanism and control of Hg uptake in Hg-methylating bacteria, we investigated the effect of sulfide on Hg methylation by pure cultures of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). Our previous research in natural sediments has suggested that Hg methylation occurs most rapidly when sulfide concentrations favor formation of neutral dissolved Hg-S species. In this study, the chemical speciation of Hg in culture media was manipulated by growing D. propionicus across a range of sulfide concentrations, with inorganic Hg (HgI) added in the form of ground ores. A solid-phase, rather than a dissolved source of Hg, was used to simulate the controls on Hg partitioning between solid and aqueous phases found in natural sediments. Methylmercury (MeHg) production by cultures was not related to the absolute solid-phase concentration of Hg in the ores, and it was only weakly related to the dissolved HgI concentration in the medium. However, MeHg production was linearly related to the calculated concentration of the dominant neutral complex in solution, HgS degrees. Furthermore, the diffusive membrane permeability of HgS degrees, as estimated from its octanol-water partitioning coefficient, was found to be sufficient to support MeHg production by cells. The present paper expands on our previous work by providing experimental support of our hypothesis that sulfide influences methylation by affecting the speciation of dissolved HgI and its uptake via passive diffusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van der Waals Volumes and Radii
Bondi, A. (1964) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100785a001 · Cited by 19,350
Brock Biology of Microorganisms
Madigan, M. T., Bender, K. S., Buckley, D. H., Sattley, W. M., & Stahl, D. A. (1996) · Cited by 5,759
Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Anoxic Estuarine Sediment
Compeau, G. C., & Bartha, R. (1985) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.50.2.498-502.1985 · Cited by 1,224
Transport and Diffusion Across Cell Membranes
(1986) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-664660-3.x5001-7 · Cited by 1,024
Bloom, N. (1989) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f89-147 · Cited by 885
Bloom, N., & Fitzgerald, W. F. (1988) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(00)80743-6 · Cited by 867
Horvat, M., Liang, L., & Bloom, N. S. (1993) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0003-2670(93)80364-q · Cited by 665
Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition
Gilmour, C. C., & Henry, E. A. (1991) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/0269-7491(91)90031-q · Cited by 652
Self-citationImportance of Wetlands as Sources of Methyl Mercury to Boreal Forest Ecosystems
St. Louis, V. L., Rudd, J. W. M., Kelly, C. A., Beaty, K. G., Bloom, N. S., & Flett, R. J. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f94-106 · Cited by 544
Gilmour, C. C., Riedel, G. S., Ederington, M. C., Bell, J. T., Gill, G. A., & Stordal, M. C. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005972708616 · Cited by 470
Self-citation
Cited by
Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems
Barkay, T., Miller, S. M., & Summers, A. O. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00046-9 · Cited by 1,054
Selenium and mercury in organisms: Interactions and mechanisms
Yang, D.-Y., Chen, Y.-W., Gunn, J. M., & Belzile, N. (2008) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a08-001 · Cited by 304
Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Hall, B. D., Aiken, G. R., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Marvin-DiPasquale, M., & Swarzenski, C. M. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.017 · Cited by 207
Review: Biological methylation of less-studied elements
Thayer, J. S. (2002) · Applied Organometallic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/aoc.375 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-132
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1994336434
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Sulfide on Solid-Phase Mercury Bioavailability for Methylation by Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus(1pr3). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es001415n
- The paper
- Benoit, J. M., Gilmour, C. C., & Mason, R. P. (2001). The Influence of Sulfide on Solid-Phase Mercury Bioavailability for Methylation by Pure Cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus(1pr3). Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001415n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.