The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbially Catalyzed Nitrate-Dependent Oxidation of Biogenic Solid-Phase Fe(II) Compounds
Abstract
The potential for microbially catalyzed NO3(-)-dependent oxidation of solid-phase Fe(II) compounds was examined using a previously described autotrophic, denitrifying, Fe(II)-oxidizing enrichment culture. The following solid-phase Fe(II)-bearing minerals were considered: microbially reduced synthetic goethite, two different end products of microbially hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) reduction (biogenic Fe3O4 and biogenic FeCO3), chemically precipitated FeCO3, and two microbially reduced iron(III) oxide-rich subsoils. The microbially reduced goethite, subsoils, and chemically precipitated FeCO3 were subject to rapid NO3(-)-dependent Fe(II) oxidation. Significant oxidation of biogenic Fe3O4 was observed. Very little biogenic FeCO3 was oxidized. No reduction of NO3- or oxidation of Fe(II) occurred in pasteurized cultures. The molar ratio of NO3- reduced to Fe(II) oxidized in cultures containing chemically precipitated FeCO3, and one of the microbially reduced subsoils approximated the theoretical stoichiometry of 0.2:1. However, molar ratios obtained for oxidation of microbially reduced goethite, the other subsoil, and the HFO reduction end products did not agree with this theoretical value. These discrepancies may be related to heterotrophic NO3- reduction coupled to oxidation of dead Fe(III)-reducing bacterial biomass. Our findings demonstrate that microbally catalyzed NO3(-)-dependent Fe(II) oxidation has the potential to significantly accelerate the oxidation of solid-phase Fe(II) compounds by oxidized N species. This process could have an important influence on the migration of contaminant metals and radionuclides in subsurface environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferrous iron oxidation by anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria
Widdel, F., Schnell, S., Heising, S., Ehrenreich, A., Assmus, B., & Schink, B. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362834a0 · Cited by 735
Cited by
Burgin, A. J., & Hamilton, S. K. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[89:hwotro]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,112
Review: Direct and Indirect Electrical Stimulation of Microbial Metabolism
Thrash, J. C., & Coates, J. D. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es702668w · Cited by 375
Insight into the evolution of the iron oxidation pathways
Ilbert, M., & Bonnefoy, V. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.10.001 · Cited by 343
In-Situ Evidence for Uranium Immobilization and Remobilization
Senko, J. M., Istok, J. D., Suflita, J. M., & Krumholz, L. R. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011240x · Cited by 340
Microbial anaerobic Fe(II) oxidation – Ecology, mechanisms and environmental implications
Bryce, C., Blackwell, N., Schmidt, C., Otte, J., Huang, Y., Kleindienst, S., Tomaszewski, E., Schad, M., Warter, V., Peng, C., et al. (2018) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14328 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, K. A., Picardal, F. W., & Roden, E. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-03-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1644-1650
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1964917293
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.