The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mathematical Model for Meso- and Thermophilic Anaerobic Sewage Sludge Digestion
Abstract
A mathematical model is developed to describe the dynamic behavior of mesophilic (35 +/- 5 degrees C) and thermophilic digestion (55 +/- 5 degrees C). Special emphasis is given to acetotrophic methanogenesis and propionate degradation, as the steps that determine the stability of anaerobic digestion, as well as to hydrolysis rate, which determines the degradation efficiency of particulate degradable organic carbon. Within the range of 6-20 (mesophilic) and 2-8 d (thermophilic) hydraulic retention time (HRT), the observed maximum growth rates for acetotrophic methanogens are 0.33 and 1.3 d(-1), respectively, with a 15% decay rate. Temperature and pH dependence as well as ammonia inhibition of acetate and propionate conversion are determined and included in the model, which allows us to simulate the effect of protein- and nitrogen-rich waste addition and the consequences of temporarily increased free ammonia at high pH. No inhibition of hydrogen conversion was observed in the same free ammonia range. The pH optimum is between 6.6 and 7.3. Acetotrophic methanogenesis is strongly inhibited below pH 6.2, whereas above pH 7.4 it can be inhibited by free ammonia. For digesters fed with ordinary municipal sewage sludge, free ammonia inhibition of acetate conversion leads to an increase in acetate at about 35 and 140 mg of N/L for mesophilic (HRT = 20 d) and thermophilic (HRT = 6 d) conditions, respectively. The hydrolysis rate constant is 0.25 and 0.4 d(-1) respectively for these two conditions. The model is validated with load variation experiments in laboratory and full-scale digesters for step and shock loads.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Cited by
Demirel, B., & Scherer, P. (2008) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-008-9131-1 · Cited by 1,200
Cruz Viggi, C., Rossetti, S., Fazi, S., Paiano, P., Majone, M., & Aulenta, F. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5016789 · Cited by 698
Saady, N. M. C. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.122 · Cited by 533
Propionate Oxidation by and Methanol Inhibition of Anaerobic Ammonium-Oxidizing Bacteria
Güven, D., Dapena, A., Kartal, B., Schmid, M. C., Maas, B., van de Pas-Schoonen, K., Sozen, S., Mendez, R., Op den Camp, H. J. M., Jetten, M. S. M., et al. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.2.1066-1071.2005 · Cited by 417
LIU, C., YUAN, X., ZENG, G., LI, W., & LI, J. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.013 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegrist, H., Vogt, D., Garcia-Heras, J. L., & Gujer, W.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-01-31
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1113-1123
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2054365926
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.