Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Improved Thermal Oxidation Method for the Quantification of Soot/Graphitic Black Carbon in Sediments and Soils

Gélinas, Yves, Prentice, Kenneth M., Baldock, Jeffrey A., Hedges, John I.·2001·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Recent findings have confirmed the importance of black carbon (BC) in the global biogeochemical cycles of carbon and oxygen through its important contribution to the slowly cycling organic carbon (OC) pool. Yet, most BC determination methods published to date measure operationally defined BC fractions, oftentimes with a high potential for artifacts and a lack of specificity for one of the two major forms of the BC continuum, soot/graphitic BC (GBC) and char/charcoal BC (CBC). This paper describes a method that reduces the potential for artifacts to accurately and selectively measure the concentration of GBC in complex mineral and organic matrixes. Marine and lacustrine sediments, river sediments, suspended particles, and a marine plankton sample were first demineralized with a mixture of hydrochloric (HCl) and hydrofluoric (HF) acids to expose any biochemical entrapped in a mineral matrix. The hydrolyzable organic matter fraction (mostly proteins and carbohydrates) was then removed with 02-free trifluoroacetic acid and HCl, after which the non-GBC, non-hydrolyzable OC fraction was finally removed by thermal oxidation at 375 degrees C for 24 h. The specificity of the method for GBC was assessed with pure CBC and GBC samples. Detection limit and GBC recovery in spiked samples were 10 mg kg(-1) and approximately 85%, respectively. Typical GBC concentrations measured in a series of natural samples ranged from <10 mg kg(-1) in marine plankton to 0.19% in a riverine sample. These concentrations were lower by as much as 3 orders of magnitude than those obtained by thermal oxidation without demineralization and removal of hydrolyzable organic matter. The improvements presented in this work allow for the accurate and precise measurement of GBC in complex organic and mineral matrixes by eliminating the interference caused by the presence of CBC, residual non-BC OC and minerals, or by the formation of condensation products that could account for as much as 4-6% of total OC. Combined to stable and radioisotope analysis, this improved method should permit quantitative assessments of the role and dynamics of GBC in the global geochemical cycles of carbon and oxygen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es010504c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gélinas, Y., Prentice, K. M., Baldock, J. A., & Hedges, J. I.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2001-08-07
Volume
35
Issue
17
Pages
3519-3525
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2084474840
Cited by
251
References
0
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.