The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability of Nitrate Contamination of Recently Recharged Groundwaters in the Conterminous United States
Abstract
A new logistic regression (LR) model was used to predict the probability of nitrate contamination exceeding 4 mg/L in predominantly shallow, recently recharged groundwaters of the United States. The new model contains variables representing (1) N fertilizer loading (p < 0.001), (2) percent cropland-pasture (p < 0.001), (3) natural log of human population density (p < 0.001), (4) percent well-drained soils (p < 0.001), (5) depth to the seasonally high water table (p < 0.001), and (6) presence or absence of unconsolidated sand and gravel aquifers (p = 0.002). Observed and average predicted probabilities associated with deciles of risk are well correlated (r2 = 0.875), indicating that the LR model fits the data well. The likelihood of nitrate contamination is greater in areas with high N loading and well-drained surficial soils over unconsolidated sand and gravels. The LR model correctly predicted the status of nitrate contamination in 75% of wells in a validation data set. Considering all wells used in both calibration and validation, observed median nitrate concentration increased from 0.24 to 8.30 mg/L as the mapped probability of nitrate exceeding 4 mg/L increased from < or =0.17 to >0.83.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Drinking Water Nitrate and Human Health: An Updated Review
Ward, M., Jones, R., Brender, J., De Kok, T., Weyer, P., Nolan, B., Villanueva, C., & Van Breda, S. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15071557 · Cited by 1,576
Self-citationEnhanced Nitrate-to-Ammonia Activity on Copper–Nickel Alloys via Tuning of Intermediate Adsorption
Wang, Y., Xu, A., Wang, Z., Huang, L., Li, J., Li, F., Wicks, J., Luo, M., Nam, D.-H., Tan, C.-S., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b13347 · Cited by 1,380
Workgroup Report: Drinking-Water Nitrate and Health—Recent Findings and Research Needs
Ward, M. H., deKok, T. M., Levallois, P., Brender, J., Gulis, G., Nolan, B. T., & VanDerslice, J. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8043 · Cited by 891
Self-citationGlobal Isotope Hydrogeology―Review
Jasechko, S. (2019) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2018rg000627 · Cited by 384
Nitrate Intake and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer and Thyroid Disease
Ward, M. H., Kilfoy, B. A., Weyer, P. J., Anderson, K. E., Folsom, A. R., & Cerhan, J. R. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181d6201d · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Nolan, B. T., Hitt, K. J., & Ruddy, B. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-04-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2138-2145
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2047691313
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.