The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mercury(II) Sorption to Two Florida Everglades Peats: Evidence for Strong and Weak Binding and Competition by Dissolved Organic Matter Released from the Peat
Abstract
The binding of mercury(II) to two peats from Florida Everglades sites with different rates of mercury methylation was measured at pH 6.0 and 0.01 M ionic strength. The mercury(II) sorption isotherms, measured over a total mercury(II) range of 10(-7.4) to 10(-3.7) M, showed the competition for mercury(II) between the peat and dissolved organic matter released from the peat and the existence of strong and weak binding sites for mercury(II). Binding was portrayed by a model accounting for strong and weak sites on both the peat and the released DOM. The conditional binding constants (for which the ligand concentration was set as the concentration of reduced sulfur in the organic matter as measured by X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy) determined for the strong sites on the two peats were similar (Kpeat,s = 10(21.8 +/- 0.1) and 10(22.0 +/- 0.1) M-1), but less than those determined for the DOM strong sites (Kdom,s = 10(22.8 +/- 0.1) and 10(23.2 +/- 0.1) M-1), resulting in mercury(II) binding by the DOM at low mercury(II) concentrations. The magnitude of the strong site binding constant is indicative of mercury(II) interaction with organic thiol functional groups. The conditional binding constants determined for the weak peat sites (Kpeat,w = 10(11.5 +/- 0.1) and 10(11.8 +/- 0.1) M-1) and weak DOM sites (Kdom,w = 10(8.7 +/- 3.0) and 10(7.3 +/- 4.5) M-1) were indicative of mercury(II) interaction with carboxyl and phenol functional groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review
Ravichandran, M. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011 · Cited by 1,254
Zheng, W., & Hintelmann, H. (2009) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2009.08.016 · Cited by 358
Minor, E. C., Swenson, M. M., Mattson, B. M., & Oyler, A. R. (2014) · Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts · doi:10.1039/c4em00062e · Cited by 305
Skyllberg, U. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2008jg000745 · Cited by 279
Zheng, W., & Hintelmann, H. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp910353y · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Drexel, R. T., Haitzer, M., Ryan, J. N., Aiken, G. R., & Nagy, K. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-08-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4058-4064
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2082359902
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mercury(II) Sorption to Two Florida Everglades Peats: Evidence for Strong and Weak Binding and Competition by Dissolved Organic Matter Released from the Peat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0114005
- The paper
- Drexel, R. T., Haitzer, M., Ryan, J. N., Aiken, G. R., & Nagy, K. L. (2002). Mercury(II) Sorption to Two Florida Everglades Peats: Evidence for Strong and Weak Binding and Competition by Dissolved Organic Matter Released from the Peat. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0114005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.