The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Root Turnover: An Important Source of Microbial Substrates in Rhizosphere Remediation of Recalcitrant Contaminants
Abstract
The growth dynamics and phenolic content of mulberry (Morus sp.) fine roots (<1 mm diameter) were determined and examined in relationship to rhizosphere remediation of recalcitrant soil contaminants. Root turnover measurements of rhizotron-grown plants showed that 58% of the fine roots produced during a 6-month growing season (June-November) died at the end of the season. The concentration of phenolic compounds in fine roots increased approximately 2-fold during the later stages of the season, and the total phenolic content of dead fine roots reached a maximum value of 38 mg/g dry weight. The late-season increase in total phenolics was primarily due to accumulation of three different flavones (morusin, morusinol, and kuwanon C). These three flavones were shown to support the growth of the bacterium Burkholderia sp. LB400, a degrader of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Thus, it has been established that, upon death, the fine roots of mulberry can serve as a source of substrate for PCB-degrading bacteria. These results establish for the first time that the chemical content and turnover rate of fine roots should be considered an important aspect of rhizosphere remediation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: Potential and challenges
Gerhardt, K. E., Huang, X.-D., Glick, B. R., & Greenberg, B. M. (2009) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.014 · Cited by 959
Plant–bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils
Khan, S., Afzal, M., Iqbal, S., & Khan, Q. M. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.045 · Cited by 411
Passatore, L., Rossetti, S., Juwarkar, A. A., & Massacci, A. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.051 · Cited by 290
Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)-Degrading Bacteria Associated with Trees in a PCB-Contaminated Site
Leigh, M. B., Prouzová, P., Macková, M., Macek, T., Nagle, D. P., & Fletcher, J. S. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.72.4.2331-2342.2006 · Cited by 265
Self-citationLange, M., Habekost, M., Eisenhauer, N., Roscher, C., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Oelmann, Y., Scheu, S., Wilcke, W., Schulze, E.-D., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096182 · Cited by 233
“Furthermore, it is known, that the number of plant functional groups and presence of legumes may be related to turnover rates and decomposition of fine roots [24,56,57], which might cause changes in microbial community structure.”
BackgroundHussain, F., Khan, A. H. A., Hussain, I., Farooqi, A., Muhammad, Y. S., Iqbal, M., Arslan, M., & Yousaf, S. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16149-7 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Leigh, M. B., Fletcher, J. S., Fu, X., & Schmitz, F. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-02-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1579-1583
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2035304069
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.