The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Natural Background Concentrations of Nutrients in Streams and Rivers of the Conterminous United States
Abstract
Determining natural background concentrations of nutrients in watersheds in the developed world has been hampered by a lack of pristine sampling sites covering a range of climatic conditions and basin sizes. Using data from 63 minimally impacted U.S. Geological Survey reference basins, we developed empirical models of the background yield of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) from small watersheds as functions of annual runoff, basin size, atmospheric nitrogen deposition rate, and region-specific factors. We applied previously estimated in-stream loss rates to yields from the small watershed models to obtain estimates of background TN and TP yield and concentration throughout the stream/river network in 14 ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Background TN concentration varies from less than 0.02 mg L(-1) in the xeric west to more than 0.5 mg L(-1) along the southeastern coastal plain. Background TP concentration varies from less than 0.006 mg L-(1) in the xeric west to more than 0.08 mg L(-1) in the great plains. TN concentrations in U.S. streams and rivers currently exceed natural background levels by a much larger factor (6.4) than do TP concentrations (2.0). Because of local variation in runoff and other factors, the range of background nutrient concentrations is very large within some nutrient ecoregions. It is likely that background concentrations in some streams in these regions exceed proposed nutrient criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eutrophication of U.S. Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages
Dodds, W. K., Bouska, W. W., Eitzmann, J. L., Pilger, T. J., Pitts, K. L., Riley, A. J., Schloesser, J. T., & Thornbrugh, D. J. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801217q · Cited by 1,576
Lewis, W. M., Wurtsbaugh, W. A., & Paerl, H. W. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202401p · Cited by 554
Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams
Dodds, W. K. (2006) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0671 · Cited by 451
The quality of our nation's waters: Nutrients in the nation's streams and groundwater, 1992-2004
Dubrovsky, N., Burow, K. R., Clark, G. M., Gronberg, J. M., Hamilton, P. A., Hitt, K. J., Mueller, D. S., Munn, M. D., Nolan, B. T., Puckett, L., et al. (2010) · Circular · doi:10.3133/cir1350 · Cited by 416
Ecological Assessments with Algae: A Review and Synthesis
Stevenson, J. (2014) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/jpy.12189 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. A., Alexander, R. B., & Schwarz, G. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-06-13
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3039-3047
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1967188151
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Background Concentrations of Nutrients in Streams and Rivers of the Conterminous United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es020663b
- The paper
- Smith, R. A., Alexander, R. B., & Schwarz, G. E. (2003). Natural Background Concentrations of Nutrients in Streams and Rivers of the Conterminous United States. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020663b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.